Ted Christopher

This book presents a thought-provoking exploration of scientific paradigms, challenging commonly accepted theories in the fields of biology and evolution.

One of the book's strengths lies in its boldness and willingness to question established scientific narratives. Christophe's essays delve into topics such as the limitations of the modern synthesis in evolutionary biology and the potential role of epigenetics in shaping the course of evolution. By challenging prevailing orthodoxies, the author encourages readers to engage critically with scientific ideas and consider alternative perspectives.

Offers readers a glimpse into the ongoing debates and controversies within the scientific community. Christophe's essays are well-researched and thoughtfully argued, providing readers with valuable insights into the complexities of scientific inquiry and the process of knowledge production.

However, while the book raises important questions and prompts readers to think deeply about the nature of science and knowledge, some may find that Christophe's arguments lack sufficient empirical evidence or fail to fully engage with counterarguments. Additionally, the writing style can be dense and technical at times, making certain sections of the book inaccessible to readers without a background in biology or evolutionary theory.

A thought-provoking read that challenges readers to reconsider their assumptions about the natural world. While some may appreciate the book's skepticism and willingness to question scientific orthodoxy, others may find its arguments lacking in empirical support or clarity. Overall, Ted Christophe's work serves as a valuable contribution to ongoing discussions about the nature of science and the search for knowledge.… (meer)

I have long question the absoluteness of DNA, largely because if you do read the reports about the breakthroughs you can see holes so large that jumbo jets can be flown through them. Primary to me is how small the samplings are to "prove" a DNA trait, not to mention that the sample populations cannot be determined to be pure to begin with. Add to this the zealot dogma of science as being all-knowing and scientists as being infallible deities. The cult of science can be likened to Middle Age Catholicism in which neither the Church, nor her 'holy men' could be questioned or challenged.

Christopher points out that even in their labs they have tunnel vision, forget looking at the whole world with open eyes. This inability to even allow questions that might have physical, tangible, answers to exist and to crucify any one displaying such blatant impropriety has limited and distorted our understanding and knowledge of all things. Christopher points out that science has become a religion of materialism that only the physical attributes have value and so much so in fact that they are the only value.

We are being fed lines by the experts about everything about us and regarding us is "in the DNA". The problem is that the research consistently fails to support that absolute and yet science still beats that drum so loudly as to drowned out anyone pointing that out or questioning it. Ironically, we used to consider those that could not understand the things that they could not see for themselves to be ignorant, currently we do not question those that will not attempt to understand anything they cannot see in their petri dishes.

Christopher presents valid arguments against the scientism of today. The work can be a challenging read, especially considering the author's abusive love of the apostrophes. You will come across sentences that you have to decipher. Here's your key....if the 's blows your mind, drop it and or add in 'has', that should make those sentences readable. In spite of the proof errors the information is worth the time… (meer)