Markeer dit bericht als misbruik

Wat is misbruik? (1) persoonlijke aanvallen, (2) reclame, (3) spam. Zie gebruiksvoorwaarden.

Groep:  "I See Dead People's Books" ignore
Onderwerp:  Use of Blanket Authors 0 / 3 gelezen

jan 21, 2010, 9:18am (naar boven)Bericht 1: Collectorator

Hello, I don't mean to annoy anyone unduly, but I have a question regarding the usage of 'blanket' authors when working on the Legacy Libraries project. By 'blanket' I mean anon, multiple, several, n/a, etc.

I believe that those blanket authors should never be used. That's my opinion.

I do see Legacy Libraries that use them and I'm wondering if there is a reason for it that I am missing.

When is it 'Good' to use 'blanket' authors?

jan 21, 2010, 9:19am (naar boven)Bericht 2: jbd1

Can you give me a for-instance? I can't say that I've seen this.

jan 21, 2010, 12:34pm (naar boven)Bericht 3: jbd1

Collectorator's sent me a few examples of this, and I think it's fair to say that where there is not an author of the book, or it's written anonymously, &c., there shouldn't be anything in the author field. In the case of multiple authors, there should be a main author (use a library record to find this) and then the others can be added in the "Other Authors" field.

If anyone has questions about this, just ask!

(terug naar boven)

Debug test: your member name is:

Help/Veel gestelde vragen | Over LibraryThing | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Blog | Contact | LibraryThing.com | APIs | WikiThing | Algemene Kennis | 49,558,802 boeken!