Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... The Importance of Being Earnest and Other Plays (origineel 2000; editie 2001)door Oscar Wilde (Auteur), Richard Allen Cave (Redacteur), Richard Allen Cave (Introductie), Richard Allen Cave (Commentary)
Informatie over het werkThe Importance of Being Earnest and Other Plays (Penguin Classics) door Oscar Wilde (2000)
Books Read in 2010 (180) Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)
Algernon pretends to be Jack's troublesome younger brother, in Wilde's satirical assault on nineteenth-century fashions, manners, and morality. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)822.8Literature English English drama Victorian period 1837-1900LC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
|
Anyway, I'm glad I got around to reading some of his plays. 'Lady Windemere's Fan' is very clever, and feels to me almost like a mythical allegory: social outsider takes on herself the 'sins' of society. Only the social outsider can do this, because only she is willing to recognize that those sins aren't particularly sinful. Happiness ensues, due to one woman's sacrifice. 'A Woman of No Importance' was my least favorite here; in the other plays the wittiest, most fun characters are also the upright ones. Here I wanted to slap the morally upright characters in the face. By contrast, in 'An Ideal Husband' the most attractive character is the one who ends up being the ideal husband. And it's funnier. Of course 'Earnest' is far and away the best piece here. Wilde makes his moral points without moralizing, and definitively chooses silliness over sententiousness. The characters might not be as impressive as Lord Goring in 'Husband', but the play as a whole is far better. The two symbolist works, 'Salome' and 'A Florentine Tragedy,' show Wilde's range, for the better in 'S', for the worse in AFT, which is almost unreadable. Anyone who enjoys Strauss' opera will enjoy reading Wilde's play.
As for the edition, the apparatus is a little overwhelming: there's no distinction between a note that you really need to know for reading the play (i.e., I imagine few will get the joke about the aristocracy suffering from 'agricultural depression' without the note about economic fluctuations of the time) and notes that will just irritate you (i.e., textual variations that are clearly less effective than the established text).
This is all very humorless, I know. And in matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity, is the vital thing. ( )