Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Into the Cannibal's Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa (editie 2011)door Ilana Mercer (Auteur)
Informatie over het werkInto the Cannibal's Pot: Lessons for America from Post-Apartheid South Africa door Ilana Mercer Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
"Into the Cannibal's Pot: Lessons for America from post-Apartheid South Africa" is a polemical work anchored in history, reality, fact, and the political philosophy of classical liberalism. It is a manifesto against mass society, arguing against raw, ripe, democracy, here (in the US), there (in South Africa), and everywhere. 'Into the Cannibal's Pot' follows Russell Kirk's contention that 'true freedom can be found only within the framework of a social order.' It is a reminder that, however imperfect, civilized societies are fragile. They can, and will, crumble in culturally inhospitable climes. The tyranny of political correctness, so unique to the West--plays a role in their near-collapse. Advanced societies don't just die; they either wither from within, or, like South Africa, are finished off by other western societies. Ilana Mercer delivers a compelling book; it is required reading for thinking people who care about the destiny of western civilization." Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)305.896Social sciences Social Sciences; Sociology and anthropology Groups of people Ethnic and national groups ; racism, multiculturalism Other Groups African OriginLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Where it fails to reach its potential is, I suspect, due to a lack of as much attention from editors as it deserves. Every book needs the polish of an experienced editor, and this one seems to have failed to receive that treatment. This is surely due, in large part, to the difficulties the author -- a political essayist of surpassing talent -- had getting it published. It had effectively been shut out of attention from major publishers, and ended up being published by a firm that seems to have lacked the resources to bring the production of this book to a more satisfactory conclusion. With the right editorial touches, it could have gentled some of its polemical tone from what is eminently appropriate to a brief essay, tightened up its structure, and smoothed out some of the phrasing. In all, as a fairly choosy reader with high standards, I still would have given it five stars if it had felt more finished in its published form.
It is certainly worth the read for the sometimes surprising information it contains. ( )