![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![Stoner McTavish door Sarah Dreher](https://pics.cdn.librarything.com/picsizes/54/61/54614ba0441deeb5972394c6767433041414141_v5.jpg)
Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Stoner McTavish (origineel 1985; editie 2013)door Sarah Dreher, Martina Friedrich (Übersetzer), Else Laudan (Übersetzer)
Informatie over het werkStoner McTavish door Sarah Dreher (1985)
![]() Bezig met laden...
![]() Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)Stoner McTavish (1) Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)Ariadne Krimi (1011)
Stoner McTavish introduces readers to one of mystery fiction's most engaging and much-loved female private eyes. Lesbian travel agent turned reluctant detective, Stoner McTavish is a popular character of this genre. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
![]() GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999LC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:![]()
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
It was good. Not the most fast-paced thing ever, but with loads of great characters, poetic descriptions of the western US landscape, and lots of emotional processing (coming out, homophobia/etc., family issues, abuse, the works---but very well done). It made me miss Colorado, but it doesn't take much to do that. I was slightly surprised to find that I understood almost all the cultural references, considering it was published three years before I was born.
The only real lacks in the book were a more fleshed-out villain and some typesetting errors that made the very clever and fast-paced dialogue difficult to read. (Lots of dropped beginning and ending quotes, speakers not being distinguished so that sometimes I had to reread it and count even and odd lines, and no way to distinguish internal dialogue from third-person-ish description. You know what I mean? When characters talk to themselves in italics? Italics would have been really helpful.)
Not a masterpiece, but it's so cool that books like this exist. (