Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... House and Philosophy: Everybody Lies (The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series) (editie 2008)door Henry Jacoby (Redacteur), William Irwin (Redacteur)
Informatie over het werkHouse and Philosophy: Everybody Lies (The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series) door Henry Jacoby (Editor)
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. This was an interesting read with a few good essays. However, several of the essays had practical issues (the quoted episode was about a different character) and two flat out misquoted the show and based the article ON that misquote. I spent half the time in contemplation and the other half raging at the book. If the goal was to get an emotional reaction, it succeeded. In the bios of the authors, one said that she thought Hugh Laurie's British accent on Jeeves & Wooster was excellent. I sure hope that was a joke... The e book format I bought was buggy due to the chapter and sub-chapter layout and the index. Either you love House or philosophy or both in which case you will likely enjoy this work. It is written at an introductory level for educated persons or undergraduates so you will not necessarily discover anything profound about philosophy but you will find an interesting application of philosophy about a hit TV show, in particular the acerbic, but in some ways lovable, Gregory House, M.D. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)
"Dr. Gregory House is arguably the most complex and challenging antihero in the history of television, but is there more to this self-important genius than gray matter and ego? This book takes a deeper look at House to reveal the philosophical underpinnings of this popular medical drama and its cane-waving curmudgeon's most outrageous behavior. What emerges is a remarkable character who is part Sherlock Holmes, part Socratic philosopher, part Nietzschean superman, part Taoist rhetorician, and not at all as screwed up as you might think."--Jacket. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)791.4572The arts Recreational and performing arts Public performances Film, Radio, and Television Television TV Programs Single ProgramsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
This book was loaned to me by a friend. I haven't explored philosophy in popular culture titles much as of yet, but have been interested in doing so, and this was as good a place as any to begin. The book is a collection of essays from philosophy professors at various American universities, and the content varies from literary analysis to arguments presenting which philosophical perspectives the character of House espouses. With respect to the individual scholars, the quality of the content of these essays varies dramatically from the thought provoking to the unbelievable. One essay discusses in depth the inspiration of the character of House by the character of Sherlock Holmes, and points out fascinating correlations between House's television program and the literary world of Doyle. One essay discusses House's presentation of Sarte's philosophy ("Hell is other people"), and an entire section of the book discusses the ethics of the physicians in the show as they correspond to accepted medical ethics in the "real world." Other essays leave you flipping pages quickly to reach the end of the them because they lack all credibility from their premise forward (House as Zen Bhuddist rhetorician? Really?).
What fascinates me most about the book, however, is that it speaks to the quality of the character of Gregory House as he has been conceived by the screenwriters and brought to life by Hugh Laurie. There is something about this character, as much as he alternately repulses and attracts us, that makes us unable to look away, almost as though we've driven by a car accident. Whether it is disgust or admiration that motivates the viewer, almost everyone I know that watches this show has something constructive and insightful to say about House. The character is simply that powerful.
The academic ventures of recent years to discuss the rhetoric, philosophy, and theology of popular culture is an important pursuit to our society, and this book is evidence of that. The philosophy isn't presented at a deep academic level, but rather in a well-balanced style that meets both the philosophical novice and the student who has studied philosophy at some depth in the middle. The language is accessible, and overall the book goes by very quickly once you begin. All in all, If you're a fan of the show, this is a worthwhile read, if for no other reason than the fact that you will be able to discuss the next episode with much more insight and depth. ( )