Stephen Bertman

What ages would I recommend it too? Ten and up.

Length? A few evenings.

Characters? Memorable, several characters.

Setting? Real world throughout history.

Written approximately? 1986.

Does the story leave questions in the readers mind? Ready to read more.

Any issues the author (or a more recent publisher) should cover? A few stories need to be updated.

Short storyline: A look at various scenes of history throughout the world.

Notes for the reader: A fun read. Different names are now used for a few of the historical people. It's fun how they weave a story, and then show the science before finishing the story in each short chapter. Although personally, I would enjoy a little more scientific lingo, this is an easy read for anyone who knows almost no scientific lingo.… (meer)

from the cover:
the Greek emphasis on rationalism-a conviction that human reason could successfully unravel the mysteries of nature and make sense of the cosmos
an early form of humanism-a pride and confidence in human potential despite the frailty and brief tenure of individual lives
the drive to excel in every arena from the battlefield to the Olympic Games and arts competition
an insatiable curiosity that sought understanding of both human nature and the world
a fierce love of freedom and individualism that promoted freedom of thought - the prelude to science
(save for when have time to focus on this one, till then ponder the above… (meer)

'Handbook' is the operative word. Unless you're someone -- like me -- who reads reference books for entertainment, this isn't something you should pick up just to read. The information is organized like an encyclopedia and fairly dry. Often the author just presents a variety of list-like entries on major cities, rulers, etc. However, having once taken a class on the history of the ancient Near East, I find this book a nice refresher course and, of course, great for reference. My large complaint is Bertman's tone in introductory sections -- like he's addressing people who have never studied history before and feels the need to tell readers how to interpret the info he's providing, or how to think if history in general, even. Others might find that helpful, but, to me, it's just patronizing.… (meer)