Afbeelding auteur

Werken van Eric Bronson

Gerelateerde werken

The Simpsons and Philosophy: The D'oh! of Homer (2001) — Medewerker — 1,373 exemplaren

Tagged

Algemene kennis

Geslacht
male

Leden

Besprekingen

I was originally rather excited to read this book when I read the description. It left me looking forward to a book about Scott Joplin (the caveat is there that the dialogue is largely fictionalized but it is based on Joplin's life), but the book didn't deliver. Much of the book is about other people with only tangential relations to Joplin - and some of those asides don't even seem to connect back at all. I really would have like more depth where Joplin himself was concerned. The choppy jumps through time and between perspectives made the book even more difficult to follow. I feel like this had potential, it just didn't come through in the end.

(eGalley provided by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.)
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
crtsjffrsn | Aug 27, 2021 |
All right, you have The Lord of the Rings down, now when do we start on the philosophy?

That was what I inevitably thought on finishing this collection of sixteen essays plus a short selection of quotes from eminent philosophers. Every essay gives us a thought about the work of J. R. R. Tolkien, some of them quite deep. But only a few really put Tolkien's work into a philosophical framework -- and some of those (e.g. Douglas K. Blount's Ûberhobbits: Tolkien, Nietzsche, and the Will to Power) do more to illustrate the failures of philosophy than show how it illuminates the history of Middle-earth.

Does that matter? I suppose it depends on what you want. If you want a painless introduction to philosophy, there really isn't enough here to get you anywhere. If you want a collection of thoughts about Tolkien, it will likely suit you better.

That doesn't mean it's perfect. There are some essays that we'd be better off without. Essay two shows an excessive fear of technology, confusing possible evils it might bring with necessary evils it will bring. Essay three takes Sigmund Freud seriously -- which is an effective guarantee of bad results; c'mon, people, Freud's methods were dubious even at the time, and we now have empirical evidence of how incorrect they were! Essay ten repeatedly treats the Peter Jackson movies as if they actually revealed something about Tolkien (what they really reveal is that, from a philosophical standpoint, Hollywood can mess up anything). This essay also completely bollixes its understanding of the deaths of Aragorn and Arwen; Arwen did not die willingly at the end. Essay fourteen almost drove me nuts; it treats the title "Master Samwise" as if Sam were a Zen master; he was no more that than a master of slaves. Just because the author doesn't known how the British refer to people doesn't mean that he should reveal it in print. And Tolkien wasn't a dualist, and Middle-earth isn't in a yin-yang balance, and Tolkien explicitly disclaimed the Manichaeism the authors want to push him into (they admit it isn't really right, but then why yammer on about it?). As for essay fifteen and the claim that "Odysseus [was]... the noblest and most respected hero," it might be worth recalling that even Homer called him a "man of twists and turns," and portrayed him as a paranoid liar; later Greek accounts of him made him even more vile.

That's a lot of complaints about a book that I mostly liked. The problem is, the bad is clear, obvious, and blatant, and there is nothing equally clear, obvious, and brilliant; I can't point to any great new insight in this volume. If you read it with caution for the pure errors, but with an open mind to the subtle suggestions, you may well find it a helpful and enjoyable book.

[CORRECTIONS: 12/14: corrected to read "than show how." Also, N.B., this review was damaged in the May 2018 backup-and-restore problem at LibraryThing; I hope I put the line breaks back where they belong, but I was guessing; the review may be a little different than it was before.]
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
waltzmn | 1 andere bespreking | May 10, 2018 |
This book is a collection of essays on LOTR and various philosophical themes. For an alternative way of looking at the two subjects, look at Peter Kreeft's "Philosophy of Tolkien."
 
Gemarkeerd
neverstopreading | 1 andere bespreking | Apr 3, 2018 |
Not a -bad- anthology of essays on baseball and philosophy.... just.... eh. It took me a lot longer to read this than expected (also a busy time for me, with work, kids, starting up the gardens, etc), but it just seemed more drier and not as truly philosophical as some of the other pop culture and philosophy books (Seinfeld and Philosophy, Lord of the Rings and philosophy, etc). Some of the essays were more or less just essays and not even linking baseball to philosophy at all. Hit or miss articles makes it not a bad anthology but not a great one either.… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
BenKline | 1 andere bespreking | Apr 21, 2016 |

Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk

Gerelateerde auteurs

William Irwin Series Editor, Editor
Gregory Bassham Contributor
Charles Taliaferro Contributor
David Kyle Johnson Contributor
Tom Grimwood Contributor
Dennis Knepp Contributor
Philip Tallon Contributor
Randall M. Jensen Contributor
Amy Kind Contributor
David L. O'Hara Contributor
Grant Sterling Contributor
Joe Kraus Contributor
Laura Garcia Contributor
Anna Minore Contributor

Statistieken

Werken
10
Ook door
1
Leden
993
Populariteit
#25,942
Waardering
½ 3.4
Besprekingen
7
ISBNs
31
Talen
8

Tabellen & Grafieken