Alan Cooper (1) (1952–)

Even though some information is dated, the main concepts remain true (which is actually a little sad, considering the book was first published in 1999).
It's also interesting to see some largely adopted techniques today being described as new tools to help design software.
The only thing I didn't like: the condescending tone used to describe programmers. Today, it's easier and results in better things when you make friends and work together than when you act as the sole owner of the design truth.… (meer)

I think this book may have been more relevant in its time, so I don't think there's much point picking at any threads that bothered me about this book. It's just that a lot of them did, and I think it was the author's voice that bugged me, most of all. He comes across as arrogant and flailing.
I couldn't help thinking he should have applied user-centered design to his outline to maybe tighten things up a bit, as he tended to go on, flogging a dead horse and the reader long after he could have stopped; setting up a number of straw men to knock down again and again and again. The software development process is far from perfect and Cooper has some good ideas that have taken hold that sort of help (though those ideas are also abused and susceptible to bad interaction designers, of which there are many, just like there are good and bad programmers).… (meer)