Benjamin Grob-Fitzgibbon
Auteur van Imperial Endgame: Britain's Dirty Wars and the End of Empire (Britain and the World)
Over de Auteur
Benjamin Grob-Fitzgibbon is Assistant Professor of History and Cleveland C. Burton Professor of International Programs, at the University of Arkansas. His previous works include The Irish Experience during the Second World War and Turning Points of the Irish Revolution.
Werken van Benjamin Grob-Fitzgibbon
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Korte biografie
- Benjamin Grob-Fitzgibbon, is associate professor of history and a Fulbright College master teacher. He is an innovative and rigorous teacher, who demands the best from his students, and they appreciate him for it. He scores highly on student evaluations even though he is understood to be no “easy A.” He teaches a wide range of courses at both the undergraduate and graduate level and has established himself as an excellent mentor. He has published on the art teaching in the most prestigious venues in the academy, including the newsletter (Perspectives) of the American Historical Review, the top national journal in the history business.
Grob-Fitzgibbon also exemplifies excellence in historical writing. He is the author of three books, The Irish Experience during the Second World War: An Oral History (Irish Academic Press, 2004); and Turning Points of the Irish Revolution: The British Government, Intelligence, and the Cost of Indifference, 1912-1921 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), and Imperial Endgame: Britain's Dirty Wars and the End of Empire (Palgrave, 2011). He has also published a number of articles in such journals as The Historian, Terrorism and Political Violence, The Journal of Intelligence History, and British Scholar. He currently serves as director of the International Relations program and is the Cleveland C. Burton professor in international programs.
http://news.uark.edu/articles/19778/t...
Leden
Besprekingen
Statistieken
- Werken
- 3
- Leden
- 38
- Populariteit
- #383,442
- Waardering
- 3.0
- Besprekingen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 9
Grob-Fitzgibbon is particularly interested in the relationship between the decline of Britain's status as an imperial power and openness towards European union. He shows us Churchill and Ernest Bevin in 1945-51 (separately) arguing for a union of European countries ("...under British leadership", we should understand) that would defend our respective colonial interests and stand up to the Americans and Russians on equal terms — an idea which Bevin gave up when he realised that he would never have been able to stand up to Stalin over the Berlin blockade without US help. The foreign policy emphasis under Eden shifted back to the colonies and Commonwealth, but from 1956 on there was a general shift towards accepting that Britain was close to going bankrupt, and her colonial interests were historical and sentimental, rather than economically or geopolitically relevant. The Americans clearly had only a minor passing interest in what Britain did, so it was the Continent or nothing. As far as De Gaulle was concerned, of course, it would be "nothing", so not much came of that until he was finally pushed out and Britain joined the EEC in 1973.
Grob-Fitzgibbon interestingly notes that the immediate run-up to 1 January 1973 was the first time that opinion polls showed the British public having any serious doubts about the wisdom of joining the EEC. As long as the French were standing in the way, everyone wanted it, but from the moment it became a reality there was anguish about what we would do without unlimited supplies of New Zealand Cheddar. The arch-imperialist Enoch Powell formed the nucleus of anti-European movements on the right, harking back to "Britain's great days", whenever they might have been, whilst, more seriously in the short-term at least, the left wing of the Labour Party identified it all as a capitalist plot, and the party in general grasped it as a useful thing to disagree with the Tories about (notwithstanding the fact that it was Harold Wilson who had previously argued most strongly for joining). So there was the farce of the 1975 referendum, with half the Labour Party opposing the (Labour) government and half the Tory party supporting it. Plus ça change!
I found the first part of the book, covering periods I don't remember living through, quite interesting, but I felt the later parts got bogged down in narrative detail rather, without very much comment or analysis. Also, the very tight focus on political events and the exclusively Westminster point-of-view made it difficult to come to any real conclusions about what was going on. We hear a lot about correspondence between ministers and the governments of Commonwealth countries, for instance, but Grob-Fitzgibbon hardly ever gives us any figures about the actual amount of trade involved (and when he does, there's nothing to compare them with). Equally, we hear a lot about the results of meetings with foreign leaders as seen by the British, but the closest we get to hearing what the other side thought of it is an occasional follow-up note from a British ambassador in that country.… (meer)