Rohit Gupta
Auteur van KI$$: Stocks To Build A Second Source Of Income: Keep It Simple, Stupid
Werken van Rohit Gupta
Gerelateerde werken
Tagged
Algemene kennis
Er zijn nog geen Algemene Kennis-gegevens over deze auteur. Je kunt helpen.
Leden
Besprekingen
Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk
Gerelateerde auteurs
Statistieken
- Werken
- 2
- Ook door
- 1
- Leden
- 4
- Populariteit
- #1,536,815
- Waardering
- 5.0
- Besprekingen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 1
In an interesting focus of the book, he lays out a set of useful principles to consider how we are influenced by filters, but I must say I don't concur with all of them. Among them, he claims they are learned, and in a general sense I agree that they are, however, I also think of the debate about gender self - perception. Gender, in and of itself, is very much a mental model, unlike sex which has nothing to do with self - perception. Rightly or wrongly, many people maintain that gender identity is primarily innate rather than socially determined. There are few other principles that I believe require clarification and better wording or that I disagree with, but my concerns are mostly trivial.
I enjoyed the examples from medicine which he uses to highlight points. He points out that adding habits rooted in a mental model comes easier than letting them go and then notes how this facility increases drug usage. He speaks out strongly against people's propensity to attribute failure to inadequate efforts - that is a mental model to discard.
His prescriptions for winning people to one's perspective stimulate useful thought. To persuade a person to think differently, open a discussion with values rather than facts. Focus on benefits of accepting a new paradigm of thought rather than enunciating all of the flaws of a current one. These are only two examples of issues he discusses.
Interestingly, he discusses the use of psychedelic drugs as an aide to refining mental models. This topic would have made for a better small book unto itself. He doesn't flesh out the biology or the mechanics to his point of view with the same clarity with which he presents other ideas. In this sense it distracts from his highest quality texts. Also, there are undoubtedly readers who will greatly appreciate most of the book but will be put off by the drug topic which really requires a very in-depth discussion of risks and benefits. There is no great harm in catering to them a bit (though he makes repeated reminders to keep experts involved in various decision making of individuals). Drugs could be a post-script leading into a future work.
He drives home the point of how mental models determine history regardless of scale. He starts the book with an historically precarious episode during the Cold War in which one human being may have averted Armageddon. He then ends the book by illustrating how millions or billions of people must reappraise their filters regarding science authority figures to avert another form of Armageddon, specifically one from epidemics.… (meer)