Once again I find myself disagreeing with tags and ratings. In my opinion, the book is both well done, very timely and an important contribution. For me, it contained clear-cut explanation of several things I have often wondered about. I suspect that the reason the book has such low rating is that she blows holes in a good many cherished ideas. I am glad I read it and I wish she would write a follow up with a view of more recent works. The book was written in 1969, so it is missing recent works. Perhaps that is one reason why one tag calls it out-dated, but certainly as a view of the history of this genre the theories are good, I would just like her views on what has happened since 1969. Highly recommend.… (meer)
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.