Matthew D. Lassiter
Auteur van The Silent Majority: Suburban Politics in the Sunbelt South
Over de Auteur
Matthew D. Lassiter is Assistant Professor of History at the University of Michigan, where he teaches social, political, and urban/suburban history.
Werken van Matthew D. Lassiter
Gerelateerde werken
The Democratic Experiment: New Directions in American Political History (2003) — Medewerker — 30 exemplaren
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Geboortedatum
- 1970-07-03
- Geslacht
- male
Leden
Besprekingen
Lijsten
Prijzen
Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk
Gerelateerde auteurs
Statistieken
- Werken
- 5
- Ook door
- 2
- Leden
- 143
- Populariteit
- #144,062
- Waardering
- 4.1
- Besprekingen
- 1
- ISBNs
- 12
- Talen
- 1
Lassiter writes, “In the Sunbelt South, the emergent consensus for gradual desegregation and minimal compliance accompanied an unmistakable shift away from the public discourse of white supremacy in favor of a more complicated fusion of racial and class attitudes – a still inchoate ideology of individual rights, consumer liberties, and spatial privileges” (pg. 40-41). He writes of the open school movement, “Instead of a moral battle between integrationists and segregationists, Atlanta’s open-schools movement recast the campaign for racial justice as an internal power struggle within the white South, matching upwardly mobile suburban families against reactionary rural demagogues” (pg. 53). Lassiter continues, “The stance that moderation represented the position of reasonable people under attack by ‘extremists on both sides’ – a formulation that lumped massive resisters and civil rights activists together against the middle – emerged as a popular viewpoint in the rest of the nation before it became the dominant ideology in the metropolitan South” (pg. 99).
Lassiter writes, “The crucible of racial busing produced a populist revolt of the center across the metropolitan South, as white-collar families became the architects of a color-blind discourse that gained national traction as an unapologetic defense of the class privileges and consumer rights of the middle-class suburbs” (pg. 122). Further, “The CPA recast a legal debate over the historical burdens of racial discrimination as an ahistorical defense of meritocratic individualism by refusing even to acknowledge the public policies that created and reinforced stark patterns of residential segregation” (pg. 122). According to Lassiter, “In the courts and in the streets, the CPA employed a color-blind framework that attacked ‘involuntary busing’ as a violation of the original spirit of the Brown decision and the race-neutral requirement of the U.S. Constitution. Parents from the previously placid suburbs defended the class and consumer privileges of middle-class families and all-white neighborhoods and demanded the support of elected officials at the local, state, and national levels” (pg. 148). Lassiter continues, “Like the grassroots antibusing movement, the Republican administration refused to accept the legal finding that the artificial de jure/de facto distinction obscured the official policies that produced educational and residential segregation and the logical remedy that a fully integrated school district should contain no single-race facilities” (pg. 158). Further, “On the national stage, the mobilization of the Silent Majority depended upon a populist discourse that obscured the divisions between working-class and middle-class white voters and defined Middle America through a suburban identity politics based on consumer status, taxpayer rights, and meritocratic individualism” (pg. 198).
Lassiter writes, “As political rhetoric, the populist label of the Silent Majority concealed the socioeconomic and geographic divisions among white voters, but corporate executives and white-collar professionals and blue-collar laborers have not fit comfortably into a racially constructed electoral coalition at either the regional or the national level. Richard Nixon’s triumph in 1968 depended upon a de facto suburban strategy that targeted middle-class voters in the metropolitan South and positioned the GOP as the centrist alternative to the racial extremism of George Wallace and the racial liberalism of Hubert Humphrey” (pg. 227). Lassiter concludes, “The power of the populist vocabulary that dominated the Nixon era – Middle America, the Forgotten Americans, the Silent Majority, the New American Majority – arose from its ability to transcend the substantial divisions between working-class and upper-middle-class voters, but never more than temporarily. During the three decades following the national disintegration of the New Deal Order, both political parties have grappled with an unstable class dynamic at the center of their electoral strategies” (pg. 319).… (meer)