Afbeelding auteur
14 Werken 429 Leden 4 Besprekingen

Over de Auteur

Tina Seelig has a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Stanford University Medical School. She is the executive director of the Stanford Technology Ventures Program, the director of the National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation, and the author of the international bestseller What I Wish I Knew toon meer When I Was 20. In 2009, Seelig was awarded the prestigious Gordon Prize from the National Academy of Engineering for her pioneering work in engineering education. Follow the author on Twitter at commat;tseelig. toon minder

Werken van Tina Seelig

Tagged

Algemene kennis

Geslacht
female

Leden

Besprekingen

At first, I resented this book for not being a down-to-earth, attainable pedagogical model. And then I got over it when I applied the brainstorming principles to my own thinking and have come up with an innovative final exam project. Hooray!!!
 
Gemarkeerd
DrFuriosa | 1 andere bespreking | Dec 4, 2020 |
My son is taking a management class and this is one of the texts assigned. As I have more than a passing interest, I read this and one of the others and though this is flawed, it at least has some good tips top share (I cannot recommend The Innovator's DNA...not a good book on the subject and that it will be taught to collegiate minds is bothersome to me.)

First, there is nothing earth-shattering, groundbreaking here. It's been said before in untold many other books. But there are still lots of soundbites. I'll pull several for here, starting with
The scientific method is clearly invaluable when you are trying to unlock the mysteries of the world. However, you need a complementary set of tools and techniques— creative thinking— when you want to invent rather than discover.
Her italics. Of course, Ms. Seelig has a new paradigm (an innovate one?) with her "Innovation Engine", a nested pair of triangles (see here) with knowledge, imagination, and attitude on the inside, and resources, habitats, and culture on the outside. To increase imagination, she gives examples of reframing problems, summarizing
Reframing problems takes effort, attention, and practice, and allows you to see the world around you in a brand-new light. You can practice reframing by physically or mentally changing your point of view, by seeing the world from others’ perspectives, and by asking questions that begin with “why.”
Thinking outside the box is a common buzz phrase and I learned long ago that there is always a box. So I say, find the box, enlarge it or jump to another box. She talks about connecting and combining ideas with a metaphor of bees (the chapter titles are a cute-clever, that one being "Bring in the Bees"), and recognizing that this was published in 2012, I had to squelch a retort to
Very innovative companies, such a Twitter, know how important this type of cross -pollination is to creativity in their businesses, and they make an effort to hire people with unusual skills, knowing that diversity of thinking will certainly influence the development of their products
Okay, the squelch function isn't working well..."innovative"?? Anyway, on not running with the first solution trap that most people fall into, she paraphrases Tim Hurson from his book "Think Better" (a jumping off point...must find) in that the first solutions are obvious, the second more interesting, and the third set progressively more creative.
Genrich Altshuller, a Soviet inventor. TRIZ [the Russian acronym for Theory of Inventive Problem Solving]is described as an “algorithmic approach to finding inventive solutions by identifying and resolving contradictions.” Altshuller’s book Creativity as an Exact Science describes his forty inventive principles. Building on Altshuller’s scientific approach, others created an even more detailed process called the “Algorithm of Inventive Problem Solving,” which includes an eighty-five-step method for solving complicated problems.
I'd say 40 principles is rather rigorous, but 85?? For exercises in observation, one class in Stanford has students making series of field observations in a Stanford Safari, talking to different people to get different points of view about the university. And each day of the Safari, the students "ate at a different campus eatery."
This might seem terribly mundane. But this simple act reminded the students that they so often fall into routines, such as eating at the same café day after day, when over thirty different options are available on campus.
To avoid routines, I try to walk different routes, sit with different people, etc. That's good advice for promoting a broader perspective. On habitat, an example Seelig uses is the morphing of the classroom from a stimulating environment like that of a kindergarten to the row and file of high school.
What type of messages do these environments communicate ? When you enter any space, you are immersed in a narrative and become an actor in that story. You know your role and what is expected of you. For example, how do you feel and act when you walk into a lecture hall, a hotel room , an airport terminal, a doctor’s office, a concert hall, or a playground ? Each space compels you to respond differently.
(Ms. Seelig probably isn't aware of John Taylor Gatto's theory that schools were meant to turn out conformist factory workers, so the design is likely intended. That and it is easier for classroom management, which is what most pre-collegiate schools are about.) I thought the findings of one study of Seelig to be enlightening. She set up two problem solving "ecosystems" with four groups in each that had the same problem - which problem was irrelevant, it turned out, but for this, each team had to work to put together jigsaw puzzles and get the pieces they needed from the other teams within their system. One side had tables, but no chairs, the other chairs but no tables.
Remarkably, the students in the ecosystem on the side of the room with the chairs (but no tables ) almost instantly started to collaborate with one another. Within minutes, the chairs were rearranged into one large circle or pushed aside altogether, as they worked on the puzzles on the floor. They figured out that by working together, they earned the maximum number of points for the game. On the other hand, the teams on the side of the room with tables (but no chairs) all anchored themselves to their respective tables. They did not collaborate at all and thus ended up limiting the number of points each team earned.
Enlightening to me because my office is in the process of a reconfiguration and the new layout has long tables between cubes, ostensibly for collaboration. I've yet to see them used for such in the first phase of the project. Meanwhile, my staff has a large triple cube that is open and there is a lot of collaboration. Sadly, that open concept is going away, so I'm going to have to make a pointed effort to foster the collaboration another way.

Ms. Seelig gushed over Edward de Bono:
There are many effective tools for preparing individuals to work on creative teams. One of my favorites is the “Six Thinking Hats” model, developed by Edward de Bono, the renowned inventor of the concept of lateral thinking. This model describes six different roles we play on teams and shows the benefits of each role. 1 I introduce this model early in my creativity classes, because it gives the students a concrete tool that they can draw upon for the rest of the course— and the rest of their lives. In de Bono’s model there are six different roles we play on teams, each represented by a different colored hat. Most people have one dominant hat color, with one or two other colors close behind.
I really disliked de Bono's stuff, his lateral thinking isn't, and colors mean nothing...just a weird gimmick, but that's me.
Heidi Neck, who teaches entrepreneurship at Babson College, runs a workshop in which she asks the students to complete a jigsaw puzzle. When they are done, they go into another room to create a patchwork quilt, starting with a crazy collection of different fabrics. When they’re finished, she compares the two approaches and end products. Putting puzzles together requires a fixed goal, and if a single piece of the puzzle is missing, you aren’t able to succeed. On the other hand, making a quilt is an open-ended process in which you can quickly change direction based upon the pieces you have on hand. And no matter what materials you are given, you are able to complete the quilt. Heidi shows her students that innovators and entrepreneurs are much more like quilt makers than puzzle builders. They have a mind-set that allows them to respond to the unexpected and to leverage the resources that are available in order to create something of value rather than waiting for all the expected pieces to show up.
Good stuff. In her summary chapter, on Imagination
Using your knowledge about the world as fuel, your imagination is an endless renewable resource. To demonstrate this point, I ask students in my classes to do a warm-up exercise inspired by Patricia Ryan Madson in her book, Improv Wisdom. I tell them there is an imaginary present sitting on their desk and ask them to pick it up and feel how heavy it is, how big it is, and to imagine how beautifully it is wrapped. Without opening it, they are to imagine what’s in the box. Once they have that in mind , they are to open the box slowly to see what is inside. I tell them that they will be surprised to find that the present isn’t what they expected . We go around the room and each person says what they thought was in the box and what they actually found. Everyone names different things, from books and chocolate to airplane tickets for an around-the-world adventure. I then ask them to look into the box to find yet another present, and another, and another. Each time they bring out something new and surprising. The key is that this “box”— your imagination— is bottomless. If you dig down, you will always find something new.
As I said above, there is always a box; figure out ways to make it bigger.

So, I think it will be a good contrast to the Innovator's DNA book for the class and more valuable...especially if the students are motivated to go out and read more.

In addition to the Hurson book, other Jumping Off Points are Jeff Hawkins's "On Intelligence", and Ori Brafman's "Click".
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
Razinha | 1 andere bespreking | Aug 28, 2019 |
Really fun book that talks about bases and acids, sugars and starches, proteins and cells. They ask a question then explain it using food as it's example, since everyone can relate to food! They then give you a recipe where it implements the idea they were talking about, take the question, "Why don't oil and water mix", they explain that they are like magnets and they are pushed away from each other. But sometimes there is a 'third-party' that can bring them together like egg yolk or mustard. The recipe they give at the end is a honey-mustard salad dressing.… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
Jazmyn96 | Sep 2, 2017 |
Tina quotes many examples of entrepreneurs and tells us how they manufactured their own luck by working hard. The very first lesson that you'll learn from this book is that you needn't have huge money to start an enterprise - just a cool idea and you can start working on your own. She tells us you can create wealth from almost nothing.The book becomes quite less interesting towards the middle, because she keeps on describing one successful person after another but you can still read it.It would have been nice if Tina had covered more about the Stanford Technology Ventures Program and entrepreneurship stories from Stanford, but then again that's not what the book is all about.It's not a book filled with stunning nuggets of information or enlightenment, but it's inspiring nevertheless.… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
shankarganesh | Apr 18, 2010 |

Prijzen

Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk

Gerelateerde auteurs

Eliza Foss Narrator

Statistieken

Werken
14
Leden
429
Populariteit
#56,934
Waardering
½ 3.7
Besprekingen
4
ISBNs
43
Talen
8

Tabellen & Grafieken