John B. Watson (1878–1958)
Auteur van Behaviorism
Over de Auteur
John B. Watson, an American psychologist, was the founder of behaviorism, an enormously influential orientation that had an impact on sociology and political science as well as psychology. His own early research was experimental, in animal psychology and in child behavior, but in 1913 he published toon meer a startling polemical paper entitled "Psychology as a Behaviorist Views It." In it he enunciated the doctrine that psychology is strictly the science of behavior. Mentalistic concepts, images, the study of consciousness, and introspection must all be abandoned, he said, to be replaced by the objective observation of the organism's response to controlled stimuli. Watson taught for 12 years at Johns Hopkins University, where he founded a laboratory for animal experimentation and did the research and writing on which his reputation rests. Then a sensational divorce in 1920 forced him to leave the academic world for a career in advertising. He later published a semipopular book, Behaviorism (1925), which made him the second best-known psychologist of his time (after Freud). For many people, Watson's claims that there are no hereditary traits and that behavior consists of learned habits constituted the core of psychology. There are no pure behaviorists in the social sciences today, but Watson's work---which led, for example, to the use of rooms with one-way glass walls for studying behavior---survives in many direct and indirect ways. (Bowker Author Biography) toon minder
Ontwarringsbericht:
(yid) VIAF:9933786
(mao) VIAF:PND:118629476
Fotografie: John Broadus Watson at Johns Hopkins c. 1908-1921 [author: unknown]
Werken van John B. Watson
The Dangers of Too Much Mother Love 1 exemplaar
BEHAVIORISM - Psychology and Physiology 1 exemplaar
Behaviorism (Lectures) 1 exemplaar
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Gangbare naam
- Watson, John B.
- Officiële naam
- Watson, John Broadus
- Geboortedatum
- 1878-01-09
- Overlijdensdatum
- 1958-09-25
- Graflocatie
- Willowbrook Cemetery, Westport, Connecticut, USA
- Geslacht
- male
- Nationaliteit
- USA
- Geboorteplaats
- Travelers Rest, South Carolina, USA
- Plaats van overlijden
- New York, New York, USA
- Woonplaatsen
- Travelers Rest, South Carolina, USA
Greenville, South Carolina, USA - Opleiding
- Furman University
University of Chicago - Beroepen
- psychologist
advertising man - Organisaties
- Johns Hopkins University
- Prijzen en onderscheidingen
- American Psychological Association Gold Medal
- Ontwarringsbericht
- VIAF:PND:118629476
Leden
Besprekingen
Behaviorism door John B. Watson
9/6/22
This book was an....experience, as you may have noted from the quotes in the progress updates.
I want to preface this with the fact that this book from the 1920s does NOT represent behavior analysis in any way.
Watson did some groundbreaking work in respondent/reflex conditioning. Some of it is particularly horrifying and unethical, and would never be conducted in modern science. However, from a historical standpoint, both for the science of behavior as well as the general mores of the time period, it was interesting.
Watson had a lot of interesting ideas, to say the least. He gets so close to good advice in many places - always consult with your child's physician if you suspect something is wrong, don't attempt to use punishment with your child if you are angry or if the rationale is from a justice/retribution angle, don't make the things children need to learn (i.e., toilet training) a harsh or unpleasant experience, we need to better teach people on how to raise children. But so much of what he said was overly generalized, cruel, or unsubstantiated. We know so much more know about learning and for everything he said that was accurate, there was a LOT of inaccurate, just plain wrong information. That's the appeal of science, really - One person, however loud or prominent, doesn't make fact. Aggregated, checked information over time makes a fact, and that fact can always be updated or thrown out when better information comes along.
As this was a library book, and a popular one, I could real the notes people wrote in it. There was the usual, gratuitous, pointless highlighting, of course. One person with a blocky handwriting style would cross out entire sections they disagreed with and would write NO! NO! in the margins, as if they were shouting at Watson himself. Another, bafflingly, would highlight quotes and write in delicate cursive "This is practical Freudianism." in the margin. I chuckled - a classical behaviorism philosophy and Freudianism could not be more at odds. But seeing how the text was interpreted and how people reacted in this time-capsule fashion was as edifying as the book.
Do I agree with Watson? Well, no. I think his advice overall is quite terrible, despite his good intentions and despite the wealth of information he discovered on reflexes. the book added context that I think is important if I ever read Behave. Its cool to see how far we've come.… (meer)
I want to preface this with the fact that this book from the 1920s does NOT represent behavior analysis in any way.
Watson did some groundbreaking work in respondent/reflex conditioning. Some of it is particularly horrifying and unethical, and would never be conducted in modern science. However, from a historical standpoint, both for the science of behavior as well as the general mores of the time period, it was interesting.
Watson had a lot of interesting ideas, to say the least. He gets so close to good advice in many places - always consult with your child's physician if you suspect something is wrong, don't attempt to use punishment with your child if you are angry or if the rationale is from a justice/retribution angle, don't make the things children need to learn (i.e., toilet training) a harsh or unpleasant experience, we need to better teach people on how to raise children. But so much of what he said was overly generalized, cruel, or unsubstantiated. We know so much more know about learning and for everything he said that was accurate, there was a LOT of inaccurate, just plain wrong information. That's the appeal of science, really - One person, however loud or prominent, doesn't make fact. Aggregated, checked information over time makes a fact, and that fact can always be updated or thrown out when better information comes along.
As this was a library book, and a popular one, I could real the notes people wrote in it. There was the usual, gratuitous, pointless highlighting, of course. One person with a blocky handwriting style would cross out entire sections they disagreed with and would write NO! NO! in the margins, as if they were shouting at Watson himself. Another, bafflingly, would highlight quotes and write in delicate cursive "This is practical Freudianism." in the margin. I chuckled - a classical behaviorism philosophy and Freudianism could not be more at odds. But seeing how the text was interpreted and how people reacted in this time-capsule fashion was as edifying as the book.
Do I agree with Watson? Well, no. I think his advice overall is quite terrible, despite his good intentions and despite the wealth of information he discovered on reflexes. the book added context that I think is important if I ever read Behave. Its cool to see how far we've come.… (meer)
Lijsten
Prijzen
Statistieken
- Werken
- 11
- Leden
- 132
- Populariteit
- #153,555
- Waardering
- 2.8
- Besprekingen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 21
- Talen
- 2
