R. L. Whiteside (1869–1951)
Auteur van A New Commentary on Paul's Letter to the Saints at Rome
Over de Auteur
Reeksen
Werken van R. L. Whiteside
Bible Studies: Genesis-Deuteronomy 4 exemplaren
Annual Lesson Commentary on Bible School Lessons 1942 (improved uniform international series, 21st volume) (1941) 2 exemplaren
Annual Lesson Commentary on Bible School Lessons, 1937 (Improved Uniform International Series) (Improved uniform… (1937) 2 exemplaren
Paul's Letter to the Saints at Rome 1 exemplaar
Paul's Letter to the Saints at Rome C(2) 1 exemplaar
The Kingdom of Promise & Prophecy 1 exemplaar
Bible studies 1 exemplaar
Gerelateerde werken
Live Sermons By Live Men: Volume 1 — Author and Edited — 1 exemplaar
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Gangbare naam
- Whiteside, R. L.
- Officiële naam
- Whiteside, Robertson Lafayette
- Geboortedatum
- 1869-12-27
- Overlijdensdatum
- 1951-01-05
- Graflocatie
- I.O.O.F. (Interternational Order Of Odd Fellows) Cemetery, Denton, Texas
- Geslacht
- male
- Geboorteplaats
- Hickman County, Tennessee, USA
- Plaats van overlijden
- Denton, Denton County, Texas, USA
- Beroepen
- Minister, Church of Christ
- Relaties
- Whiteside, Inys (daughter)
- Korte biografie
- His education included West Tennessee Christian College at Henderson, Tenn., and Nashville Bible School. He served for two years as president of Abilene Christian College. He was a frequent contributor to the Gospel Advocate, but he became a staff writer in 1930 when his protégé, Foy E. Wallace Jr., was appointed editor. In 1934, Whiteside became query editor and continued to contribute to the Gospel Advocate on a regular basis until 1944. He was also editor of the Gospel Advocate's Annual Lesson Commentary for eight years, from 1937-1944. He co-authored the Sound Doctrine series with C. R. Nichol
Leden
Besprekingen
Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk
Gerelateerde auteurs
Statistieken
- Werken
- 25
- Ook door
- 1
- Leden
- 364
- Populariteit
- #66,014
- Waardering
- 3.6
- Besprekingen
- 4
- ISBNs
- 9
Some interesting interpretations and ways of understanding the text that are thought-provoking, at least. A lot also with which there is substantive ground for disagreement.