Dit onderwerp is gemarkeerd als "slapend"—het laatste bericht is van meer dan 90 dagen geleden. Je kan het activeren door een een bericht toe te voegen.
1messpots
Some of my most useful tag searches are searches that bring up dud books.
boring
overrated
unreadable
questionable literary merit
unfinished
too long
will never read
I wish there were a way to encourage people to use tags like these!
boring
overrated
unreadable
questionable literary merit
unfinished
too long
will never read
I wish there were a way to encourage people to use tags like these!
2twomoredays
Really? I mostly use tags like that when I'm in a cheeky mood since they don't really give me enough information.
Someone may have found a book boring for the same reasons I tend to like a book.
Still, I do have an urge to tag Ian McEwan's Saturday "the emperor has no clothes." Though I really should just list it on Bookmooch.
Someone may have found a book boring for the same reasons I tend to like a book.
Still, I do have an urge to tag Ian McEwan's Saturday "the emperor has no clothes." Though I really should just list it on Bookmooch.
3reading_fox
I use the tag rubbish from time to time. Normally I'll have managed a review explaining why I disliked it so much - so you can compare my reasons to your preferences.
4reading_fox
Dit bericht is door zijn auteur gewist.
5prosfilaes
I smacked Charlie and Chocolate Factory with "white man's burden", but I feel a lot like twomoredays in that it was cheeky more than useful.
6k8_not_kate
I agree that it would be nice to see a book's problems pop up in a tag listing, but specifics are more helpful. For instance, a tag I use sometimes with biographies and histories especially is "exhaustive in detail" which is actually a plus in some cases but would be something I would steer clear of if I was reading for sheer entertainment.
