StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Bezig met laden...

De wetten van toeval en chaos : kleine oorzaken en grote gevolgen in de moderne natuurwetenschappen (1991)

door David Ruelle

Andere auteurs: Zie de sectie andere auteurs.

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingAanhalingen
280194,448 (3.52)1
How do scientists look at chance, or randomness, and chaos in physical systems? In answering this question for a general audience, Ruelle writes in the best French tradition: he has produced an authoritative and elegant book--a model of clarity, succinctness, and a humor bordering at times on the sardonic.… (meer)
Geen
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 1 vermelding

This is a curious book. Curious because some of the topics are hard to grasp. Curious because Ruelle tells some rather colourful stories about some of the characters in it ...such as Godel and Theophile de Donder. And curious because of the sheer breadth of subjects/topics that are covered. These range from mathematics and physics, to the probabilities of coin tosses, sensitive dependence, turbulence...and Ruelle's role in developing the ideas of chaos; economics, quanta, entropy and irreversibility, information theory and Godel's theorem. Each of these sections is written more or less like a stand-alone essay...though there is some dependence on previous sections. Anyway, It's hard to summarise and do it justice. But I'll pluck out a few gems. Because of sensitive dependence slightly different initial conditions can lead to vey different outcomes ....illustrated really well with a billiard ball analogy. But scaled-up this means that with meteorology, it takes about a week for errors to become unacceptable and Ruelle claims that we already know that we shall not be able to predict the weather for more than one or two weeks in advance. I notice that, in 1968, Ruelle was trying to teach himself hydrodynamics by reading the book "Fluid Mechanics" by Landau and Lifshitz. I was trying to do the same thing at more or less the same time ....maybe a bit earlier .....but certainly with less success. (A difficult book).
A great story about Godel. Somebody had briefly occupied his office while he was away and had left a polite note saying "I hope to have the chance to get to know you more intimately on a later occasion"....he received a response from Godel which consisted of the note with that sentence underlined bye Godel and, added, in pencil, the question "Exactly what do you mean?" Ruelle describes him as "a small man yellowish, and emaciated and he wore cotton plugs in his ears". Another story about the French mathematician Jean Leray who told Ruelle that his inspiration for his great 1934 paper on hydrodynamics was watching the vortices of the River Seine as it flows past the piles of the Pont Neuf in Paris. And I've often pondered over the idea that all the molecules in a box....if you wait long enough will randomly arrange themselves all into one corner. Ruelle, does much the same with a layer of hot water poured over a layer of cold....they begin to mix into luke warm water but in principle could return to the two layers of hot and cold. How long would we have to wait....Ruelle just says too long ...and that seems to be much longer than the current age of the universe.
I like the reconciliation between chance and determinism cited by Poincare: "A very small cause, which escapes us, determines a considerable effect which we cannot ignore, and we then say that this effect is due to chance". (Though there was no quantum uncertainty in Poincare's day). And Ruelle has some harsh advice for Economists: "Legislators and government officials are thus faced with the possibility that their decisions, intended to produce a better equilibrium, will, in fact, lead to wild fluctuations, with possibly quite disastrous effects". (I think our Reserve Bank and the Federal Reserve should take notice...and I recall a friend of mine, then working in the Treasury Department in about 1990 saying that there were room-fulls of economists there who had run out of ideas about what action could be taken to fix the high inflation and high unemployment ).
As I said at the start....a curious book. But interesting and as I've been re-reading it to write this review, I've come to appreciate it more...even if it is difficult to summarise. I give it 5 stars. ( )
  booktsunami | Feb 10, 2023 |
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe

» Andere auteurs toevoegen (4 mogelijk)

AuteursnaamRolType auteurWerk?Status
David Ruelleprimaire auteuralle editiesberekend
Sosio, LiberoVertalerSecundaire auteursommige editiesbevestigd
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Informatie afkomstig uit de Italiaanse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Suam habet fortuna rationem
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Informatie afkomstig uit de Italiaanse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Vorrei mettermi gli occhiali filosofici di un honnête homme del Seicento o del Settecento, e fare una passeggiata fra i risultati scientifici del secolo XX. Una passeggiata con la guida del «caso»: alla lettera, poiché il caso sarà il mio filo di Arianna.
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

How do scientists look at chance, or randomness, and chaos in physical systems? In answering this question for a general audience, Ruelle writes in the best French tradition: he has produced an authoritative and elegant book--a model of clarity, succinctness, and a humor bordering at times on the sardonic.

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.52)
0.5
1 1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 9
3.5 4
4 5
4.5
5 6

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 204,819,102 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar