Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Agincourt, 1415 (2008)door Anne Curry (Redacteur)
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. Oddly enough, {Agincourt: 1415 The Archer's Story} really has one chapter dedicated to the bowman of that particular battle. I felt a bit mislead by the title. Up to that point the book was fairly informative and interesting with chapters on Henry V, the battle itself, and (finally) the book's namesake. This piece then wanders off into a biography of Sir Thomas Erpingham. Don't get me wrong, as alleged commander of the archers at Agincourt, Sir Thomas did deserve prominence in this book, but I felt that he dominated it instead of complimenting. Be forewarned, this book is made up of essays from several different auhors, which in itself is not a bad thing if they were essays illustrating different aspects of the longbowman or the battle. Like I said earlier, waaaay to much emphasis on Erpingham (there is an excruciating chapter on Norfolk architecture inspired by and featuring him!). An essay on his role in the two different "Henry V" films delivered the coup de grace' for me. Very dissapointed in a book that I was really looking forward to reading and wasted on vacation. There are essays in this book I really enjoyed, and others that were simply too much historical navel gazing. The essays on Henry V, employment on the Longbow, Agincourt in Shakespeare, biographical information on Thomas Erpingham were all great and helpful. The chapters on Erpingham's life in Norfolk were way more than I needed to know. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
For many commentators then and now, it was the English archers who won the day for Henry V. This lavishly illustrated history re-tells the story of the battle and Henry V's Normandy campaign from the perspective of the commander of the English archers, Sir Thomas Erpingham. Sir Thomas, an experienced warrior with military experience dating back 40 years is known for his brief but pivotal appearances in Shakespeare's Henry V, where he is correctly portrayed as an elderly, white haired veteran. At 57 he was one of the oldest there and a close personal confident of the King. But what was his background? How did he command his archers to such a place in history? And what role did the longbow and battlefield tactics play in the final analysis of victory? Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)944.025History and Geography Europe France and region France Capet and Valois 987-1589 Philip VI 1328-50; John II 1350-64; Charles V 1364-80 ; XIVth CenturyLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
It’s interesting to speculate on what would have happened if Henry V had outlived Charles V and became King of England and France; perhaps sort of a Norman Conquest in reverse? Or perhaps just a blood and treasure draining war for a hundred more years. Another topic for speculation would be what would happen if the French had won? Henry V had sworn not to be taken alive, to spare England from paying an enormous ransom; I expect the War of the Roses would have started earlier, with various claimants from the houses of Lancaster and York fighting for the throne.
Alas, I can’t speak for this book’s adequacy as a guidebook since I haven’t done any of the tours; it gives hiking, biking and car directions for following Henry’s route and they seem thorough enough. Author Hoskins repeatedly refers readers to coauthor Curry’s historical accounts of the battle and the Hundred Years War in general. Good maps of the campaign and battlefield, and numerous photographs of tour routes; a modest bibliography but I expect the more formal histories referenced are more than adequate. ( )