Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Relearning to See: Improve Your Eyesight Naturally! (editie 2000)door Thomas Quackenbush (Auteur)
Informatie over het werkRelearning to See: Improve Your Eyesight -- Naturally! door Thomas R. Quackenbush
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
In this accessible presentation of the famous Bates method, Thomas R. Quackenbush (who teaches the Bates method in California and Oregon) describes how eyesight can improve naturally, at any age and regardless of heredity. This book is a wonderful tribute to the genius of Dr. Bates, who was a pioneer in discovering how vision becomes blurred and how it restores itself naturally to clarity and acuity. Now 80 years later, his findings and teachings remain light years ahead of our contemporaries. His approach to treating vision problems was truly holistic and the theme throughout this book is very much an extension of that holistic approach. Dr. Quackenbush is to be commended for his dedication in getting the truth out and keeping the torch burning in this "bible" on vision improvement. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)617.7Technology Medicine and health Surgery, regional medicine, dentistry, ophthalmology, otology, audiology OphthalmologyLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
* Movement: eyes should always be in motion, never fixed on anything
* Centralization: keep looking at only one thing at a time
* Relaxation: don’t strain
The book includes suggestions for better shifting (sketch lines with your eyes), breathing (he likes yawning), blinking (do it more).
There is a section on nutrition (standard advice for real, low-processed foods. He also suggests no dairy or wheat).
http://www.seeing.org/ seems to be the main online site.
Wikipedia is highly critical of the method, pointing out that it’s never been scientifically validated, and that some of Bates’ assumptions about the eye are provable wrong.
( )