The first I'd heard of Boudica (or Boadicea as it was spelled then) was in the Eagle Eye Mysteries in London edutainment game- one of the Eagles' friends wrote a song inspired by her. Popped up again when I signed up for the library's winter reading program, which had a time-traveling theme- read a book written about, in or set different time periods, which is problematic for me because I tend to stick to either fantasy worlds or science. Didn't feel like reading about actual Romans for the 'Ancient Rome' category, so opted to read about the infamous British queen's rebellion against them.

An interesting read. Collingridge first looks at the historical context and story of the actual Boudica (Rome and conquering the Gauls then Ocean then Britannia, etc.) then digs into the cultural evolution of the myth around Boudicca in the second half. The most fascinating part to me was actually a tangent- the fabrication of the Celtic identity by European Romantics in the late 1700s- early 1800s and the weird fusion of Druidism and the Britons. Use of Boudica as an avatar for whatever values the people of the time wanted to say was also interesting- would love to see comparisons of all the different depictions in plays.

I have way, way too many library books in my queue so I'm glad to get this done. Actually missed submitting any reads to the winter reading program, whoops. ( )

This book covers almost the same territory as Boudica: Iron Age Warrior Queen and contains several quotes from that author Richard Hingley. The major exception being that Collingridge goes further back in time to Rome and Caesar to study their attitudes toward women in society as a backdrop for her research. Both books look at the classical authors and modern archaeology to tell their tales. Both books conclude we know very little about the woman known as Boudica--including her name, which might have been a title or battle name (it means Victory). Both books spend about half their pages on history and about half on the legend that grew up around Boudica and her image down through the ages in literature, art, drama, and role in politics. However, Collingridge's book is meant as a popular biography. There are no footnotes, attributions are given in the text, and the narrative is in modern accessible language. She does provide a select biography and index. Personally I preferred the Hingley book, but I am doing research and liked the footnotes and attributions. Both books are thorough and well-written. (I think) the casual reader would enjoy either or both. ( )

Agree with most of the reviewers here. The writing is poor and overblown. There is not much evidence on which to base a discussion of Boudica. And the desperate attempt to find modern Boudicas (including Princess Diana?!?) is a bit much. I most enjoyed the sections on the general archaeology of Iron Age Britain, but suspect that more interesting and accurate discussion of that can be found elsewhere. All the stuff about druids is poorly researched; much of it has been discredited by contemporary scholars. Collingridge seems to take hearsay and (suspect) ancient mentions of druids as solid evidence. Some interesting spots, but I ended up skimming the last couple chapters because I was losing patience with the author. ( )

Well written and highly readable. The author did research the topic well but the focus of her book is the legend behind the woman and the impact this warrior queen had for the past 2000 years. The chapters about Boudicca herself start only after half the book. ( )

The problem with writing a biography about Boudica is that there's virtually nothing in the way of evidence on which a full-length book can be based. After all, her reign, if in fact she did reign, lasted only a year, a mere blink in the span of ages. As a result, this book is also the story of the early Roman emperors, Cartimandua, and the other early British tribal leaders. On the one hand, this is an interesting approach since it provides a depth on the period and a context that helps the (limited) story of Boudica to make sense. But the book is ostensibly a book about Boudica, and in this, it misses the mark. ( )