Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Writing Science in Plain English (Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing)door Anne E. Greene
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)
"This short, focused guide presents twelve principles based on what readers need in order to understand complex information, including concrete subjects, strong verbs, consistent terms, and organized paragraphs. The author, an experienced teacher of scientific writing, illustrates each principle with real-life examples of both good and bad writing and shows how to revise bad writing to make it better. She ends each chapter with practice exercises so that readers can come away with new writing skills after just one sitting."--Back cover. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)808.06Literature By Topic Rhetoric and anthologies Rhetoric and anthologies By Type Of WritingLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Scientific writing is often dry and difficult to understand – but as Greene points out, it doesn’t have to be. By following good writing practices (in the tradition of the famed Strunk and White), scientific writing can be engaging and transformative. Indeed, the best grant proposals (read: funded grant proposals) and the most impactful papers use disciplines of plain English to communicate profound truths about nature.
Greene’s book is organized into eleven short chapters and two appendices. (One of the chapters – on parallel structure – is a measly three pages!) Each chapter is concisely written. This allows the reader to digest a topic quickly, to practice the principle through exercises, and to reenter life more skillful.
So much of good writing is getting one’s own self out of the way so that the truth of the matter can speak for itself. This book teaches small but powerful disciplines to writers of science that they might communicate more effectively. What’s the point of studying to the point of mastery if you cannot communicate your results? Because of this, I say that all scientists should study writing, and this is an excellent vehicle for doing so.
( )