StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Bezig met laden...

The Unpersuadables: Adventures with the Enemies of Science (2014)

door Will Storr

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingAanhalingen
273896,459 (3.73)6
Interweaves personal memoir and investigative journalism with the latest neuroscience and experimental psychology research to reveal how the stories individuals tell themselves about the world shape their beliefs, leading to self-deception, toxic partisanship, and science denial.
Geen
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 6 vermeldingen

1-5 van 8 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)
this was a really surprising and intersting book. Initially it seemed like a fairly straightforward tour of heretical ideas, but it was combined with some pretyy intense confessional passages from the author's past. Very well written, informative and entertaining ( )
1 stem ThomasNorford | Mar 7, 2023 |
Read at work over lunch. I'll probably buy it some time soon, though maybe not in hardcover. A great look at ways the mind makes mistakes, both sympathetic and skeptical. He ranges over a wide field, from homeopathy and Holocaust denial, to psychiatry and the skeptical movement itself. In the last part of the book Storr is on a quest to find proof that James Randi is not all he's made out to be, and of course he finds it. Rather than ridiculing and mocking those with false beliefs, he advocates trying to understand that you can also make egregious errors, that everyone does, and that this is probably not a fixable aspect of human nature. He seems to come down hard on the idea that it is immoral to have false beliefs, and I'll probably be thinking of that for quite a while.
4 stars oc ( )
  starcat | Feb 4, 2022 |
One obvious reason for this failure to communicate is the lack of science education beyond school. So that those who didn't succeed at it when young are forever excluded. If chemistry, for example, was offered more as a adult education class science would appear less as an exclusive group that only a small number can be part of.

That early ending of science education opens the door very wide for alternative views to gain ground. There is an Australian MOOC’s course provider, open2study that offers beginner courses in chemistry and physics; this is a far better way of increasing understanding, than just telling people they are wrong, and scientists are always right.

I'm inclined to agree that moving into dictating lifestyle choices is not a good move, but for me the failure of science to communicate properly was shown most clearly with the five a day campaign for fruit and vegetables.

There are extremely sound nutritional reasons for eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables a day, but not once were those very good nutritional reasons put forward, because the assumption was that "ordinary" people wouldn't understand them. So the finger wagging approach was adopted, instead. Had a less patronising method of persuading people, that offered more detailed, and better, reasons, been used, then quite likely it might have generated more interest is science, as well as better understanding of the reasons for eating five a day.

It's this "them and us" approach that is the problem, I understand that it is a desire to protect skills and the science "community" itself, by having a closed shop approach, and I understand that the desire to protect theories that have been developed over a long time, might encourage scientists to put up "keep out" signs all over the place.

A key cause of public 'scepticism' with science is (I believe) a lack of understanding of how the Scientific Method works.

We have the Sunday Papers obsessed with single studies about cancer, heralding a study on the Antarctic (for instance) as proof that AGW is not a problem and fringe groups picking up on a ragtag of studies to prove that GMO causes cancer or vaccines make your kids stupid or fluoride is a government plot.

Scientists do sometimes cheat, or perform bad science, or are biased but the scientific method slowly eliminates these in the same way evolution gets rid of dead end designs in nature. Science loves a mystery and if an unusual finding appears in a study others will research it- and if it appears to be basically correct then more studies will build on it- if it is basically flawed it will be forgotten. It is the huge constantly growing 4 dimensional jigsaw puzzle- a scientist may be able to fit a new piece but unless all the sides fit in it may not stay there.

A lot comes down to basic science education - we should all leave school knowing what a theory is in the same way we know a noun.

But, in the end it also makes it far easier for any charlatan to offer alternative theories.

Storr, a piece of advice: crackpots are not scientists. ( )
  antao | Aug 27, 2020 |
Not impressed. The author seems just as confused as his subjects. Hell, he even occasionally and temporarily buys into their scams and delusions! He just seems like a weak minded, weak willed skeptic who doesn't know what to believe, if anything. Frankly, he seems lacking in intelligence, especially so for one so highly praised. Not recommended. ( )
  scottcholstad | Dec 25, 2018 |
Though the author interviews and examines the ideas of people who are into some very..."interesting, subjects, like holocaust deniers, faith healers, and others, he also does the same to the people within the field of skepticism. What I found interesting about this book is that the author points out that even scientific or scientific-minded skeptics can they themselves become over-biased and refuse to look at other perspectives. You even need to be skeptical of skepticism!

An interesting examination into a perspective of science that many of us wouldn't consider. ( )
  Kronomlo | Jun 29, 2017 |
1-5 van 8 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)
"[A] searching, extraordinarily thoughtful exploration of what it means to believe anything — not just the weird things that the fanatics, eccentrics and heretics that Storr interviews believe."
toegevoegd door lquilter | bewerkSalon.com, Laura Miller (Mar 16, 2014)
 
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
'And then he said to me — this is honestly true — he said to me, "Well you can prove anything with facts, can't you?"'
Stewart Lee, How I Escaped My Certain Fate (2010)
'A self is probably the most impressive work of art we ever produce.'
Jerome Bruner, Making Stories: Law, Literature, Life (2002)
Opdracht
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
For Farrah
for ending the madness
Eerste woorden
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
It is Friday night in a town called Devil and the community hall is full.
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
(Klik om weer te geven. Waarschuwing: kan de inhoud verklappen.)
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

Interweaves personal memoir and investigative journalism with the latest neuroscience and experimental psychology research to reveal how the stories individuals tell themselves about the world shape their beliefs, leading to self-deception, toxic partisanship, and science denial.

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.73)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 13
3.5
4 16
4.5 1
5 7

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 203,204,813 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar