I never knew that the Loyalists were exiled after the War for American Independence. I guess I'm not surprised. But I am appalled that Charlotte's mother would let her father be so abusive. This is an important book, well done, but I can't imagine sharing it with my child. Maybe a teacher could share it with 9-10 year-olds? 3.5 stars because it's pretty good, objectively, but I didn't actually 'enjoy' it myself. ( )

When Charlotte Haines learns that her cousins Betsy and Sally will be leaving New York, the ten-year-old is distraught, especially as her stern father has forbidden any contact between his own family, and that of his brother David - Betsy and Sally's father. The year is 1783, the American Revolution has just ended, and the city's Loyalists - those who remained loyal to the British crown during the recent war, rather than espousing the Patriot cause - are being forced to evacuate to Nova Scotia. Into this category fall Uncle David and his family, while Charlotte and her family are Patriots. But when she defies her father, in order to visit with Betsy and Sally one last time, Charlotte finds herself cast off and disowned, and must also make the journey to that far Canadian wilderness.

I have to confess that, in the ordinary course of things, New York City's Tories, during and after the American Revolution, are not a group for whom I have a great deal of sympathy. These are, after all, the people who lived in comfort under British occupation, while more than ten thousand of their countrymen starved to death only a few miles away, in the deliberately inhumane British prison ships of Wallabout Bay (rotting hulks which killed more Americans than all the battles of the war combined). One has to wonder where all these "good folk" were, when the victims of this atrocity were being buried in mass graves in Brooklyn, or washing up on Manhattan's piers, as they were wont to do during the course of the conflict. No, I don't have much sympathy for the New Yorkers who sided with the British. The Iroquois who fought for the British, and then (unlike these New York Tories) were abandoned to their fate? That's another story!

Given that this is so, I think Janet Lunn's accomplishment, in Charlotte, is all the more remarkable. She put me squarely in Charlotte's shoes, and I found that, despite my decided views on the history involved (views that remain unchanged), I empathized fully with her, and with Uncle David and his family. Who wouldn't feel for an innocent child, wrongly victimized by her (clearly deranged) father, simply because she isn't as filled with hatred as he? Who wouldn't sympathize with the individuals effected by war, even if one feels that one side was more in the right than the other? For me, this poignant tale, based upon a true story, is an important reminder that even people on the right side of a conflict can behave in unconscionable ways. It's a reminder that people on the wrong side of a conflict can be decent human beings. In short, it's a reminder that conflicts - even those glorified in the national psyche - are complicated, and often involve wrong-doing on all sides.

For that reason, and for the alternative perspective it offers on the founding of this nation, I think it an incredibly valuable narrative. I wouldn't recommend it to younger readers - despite being a picture-book (with beautiful artwork, I might add), it has some very mature themes - but for those children who are middle-school age and above, and studying the Revolution, I think it can only add to their understanding of the complexity of that time. ( )

In this lushly illustrated, emotionally wrenching historically true tale of the American Revolution, Janet Lunn tells the story of young Charlotte Haines, who has to face one of the cruel realities of war, family division, and how different, conflicting ideals and philosophies can not only tear families apart, but can turn naturally stubborn, unbending individuals into absolute tyrants.

Charlotte is ten years old and lives in New York City. It is the year 1783 and she faces a major, emotionally wrenching dilemma. Her father, who supports the American Revolution has forbidden his daughter from speaking with her uncle, aunt and beloved cousins Betsy and Sally because his brother is a Loyalist. When Charlotte rebels against her tyrannical and unreasonable father and visits her relatives to say goodbye (before they are to leave for exile in Nova Scotia) her father disowns his daughter, actually turning her out of the house. Charlotte returns to her relatives' home and when neither her stubborn, obstinate father nor her meek mother relent, her uncle's family takes her along to Nova Scotia. Charlotte never sees her family again, but in a brief afterword, Janet Lunn shows that Charlotte Haines lived a happy and productive life in Nova Scotia and that one of her many grandchildren was Sir Samuel Leonard Tilley, premier of New Brunswick and one of the Fathers of Confederation (Canadian confederation).

Charlotte is an engaging, emotionally wrenching and heartbreaking story, very different from the usual Revolutionary War tales, where children are often presented as performing quiet acts of bravery and courage for the patriot cause. In fact, Charlotte turns this upside-down and on its side, showing a situation and events where the American patriot is not the hero, but the villain. I found myself completely enveloped by and drawn into the narrative, and so angry and livid at Charlotte's tyrannical father (and weak, submissive mother) that even days after reading the book, I was still experiencing trouble writing a review that was coherent and not simply a ranting tirade against Charlotte's parents. I actually had not only tears of sympathy and empathy, but tears of absolute rage and anger in my eyes, and I still cannot believe that Charlotte's father would disown his daughter for simply daring to speak to her uncle and his family (and that Charlotte's mother and older brother never questioned the father's unreasonableness and cruelty, that they never stood up for Charlotte, that they basically disowned her as well). It boggles the mind that Charlotte's father would call his own daughter a traitor, that he would disown her and reject her for a single (and small) act of supposed disobedience. In fact, I consider Charlotte's father not only a stubborn, unreasonable tyrant, but somewhat of a hypocrite, being more akin to the monarch (King George III of England) whom he supposedly so despises than the patriot (and champion of freedom) he considers himself to be. And while Charlotte is understandably shaken and dismayed at and by having lost her family, she is likely much better off with her uncle's family, she is likely fortunate to have escaped her father's tyranny.

I would consider Charlotte suitable for children above the ages of seven or eight. The text is extensive, but not difficult and actually looks accessible enough to and for younger children if one goes by writing style and word usage alone. However, very young children might be both frightened and disturbed that a young girl could be banished from not only her home, but her country due to a single, seemingly small act of disobedience (if one can even call it that). There is also much background information and historical details that would likely need to be discussed, such as the fact that both the patriots and those loyal to the Kind of England had slaves (that slavery was not just something that occurred in the Southern colonies of the future United States of America). Older children might still find Charlotte's punishment and fate a shock, but will likely know more about the period and benefit from reading the story and discussing both it and the historical background.

Brian Deines' illustrations are lush and luminous, realistically capturing the essence of upper-middle class 18th century colonial America; they provide a fitting complement to the text and could even be of use for more detailed discussions and presentations on topics such as typical 18th century furniture, the clothing worn at the time, what 18th century colonial buildings looked like and so on. However, the faces of the human figures seem rather devoid of emotional intensity; they are all quite similar in feature and expression, making them appear rather stilted and cardboard-like at times. The illustrations (paintings) do give the reader a wonderful sense of historic authenticity, but the human figures seem so much alike in their facial features that it sometimes feels as though they are just part of the general surroundings.

I do wish that Janet Lunn had included a more detailed author's note with suggestions for further reading, as well as the specific biographical sources for the story. It would make using this book in a classroom (or homeschooling) setting more of a teaching and learning tool, and having the biographical sources at hand would, of course, be of benefit if one wanted to check the historical veracity of the story (or if someone were to cast doubt on the historical veracity of the story). ( )

Meh. This would have been better as a longer story. The illustrations were lovely and it talked about a topic little explored in American history, but I just could not believe that Charlotte's father would disown her, a ten-year-old girl, merely for visiting her cousins before they left for evermore. If there had been more pages to explain his character I might have bought it. ( )

This book is a little to wordy and hard to understand for young readers.