StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Better Living Through Criticism: How to…
Bezig met laden...

Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth (editie 2017)

door A. O. Scott (Auteur)

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingAanhalingen
2296116,637 (3.23)3
"The New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now more than everFew could explain, let alone seek out, a career in criticism. Yet what A.O. Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that we are, in fact, all critics: because critical thinking informs almost every aspect of artistic creation, of civil action, of interpersonal life. With penetrating insight and warm humor, Scott shows that while individual critics--himself included--can make mistakes and find flaws where they shouldn't, criticism as a discipline is one of the noblest, most creative, and urgent activities of modern existence.Using his own film criticism as a starting point--everything from his infamous dismissal of the international blockbuster The Avengers to his intense affection for Pixar's animinated Ratatouille--Scott expands outward, easily guiding readers through the complexities of Rilke and Shelley, the origins of Chuck Berry and the Rolling Stones, the power of Marina Abramovich and 'Ode on a Grecian Urn.' Drawing on the long tradition of criticism from Aristotle to Susan Sontag, Scott shows that real criticism was and always will be the breath of fresh air that allows true creativity to thrive. "The time for criticism is always now," Scott explains, "because the imperative to think clearly, to insist on the necessary balance of reason and passion, never goes away.""--… (meer)
Lid:dandydancing
Titel:Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth
Auteurs:A. O. Scott (Auteur)
Info:Penguin Books (2017), Edition: Reprint, 304 pages
Verzamelingen:Owen, Jouw bibliotheek
Waardering:
Trefwoorden:Geen

Informatie over het werk

Better Living Through Criticism: How to Think About Art, Pleasure, Beauty, and Truth door A. O. Scott

Geen
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 3 vermeldingen

1-5 van 6 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)
I don’t know. I took notes on it, but a few days later it doesn’t leave me with a strong passion or memory; he said some smart things but ultimately I think you need a manifesto-strength thesis to make a book on criticism really work. It seemed like these were his collected thoughts from a career of criticisms, which while interesting, is not really five star book material, you know? The dialogues were the most interesting part; those seemed like the places where the author took his ideas furthest. ( )
  et.carole | May 5, 2022 |
I liked it. Helped to re-spark my love of watching movies and reading books. I always enjoy A.O. Scott's writing. ( )
  poirotketchup | Mar 18, 2021 |
While maddeningly all over the place at times, one of the best books I've ever read about why critics do what they do and the function they serve, and how criticism is a process we all engage in all the time. A.O. Scott's argument is far from a straight line and you'll wonder who the hell he is talking to at times or if he's pasted together four other books he was working on to make this one. But overall, I tried writing without a pen and after two chapters, I was already mentally underlining every 5 seconds anyway. Worthy of multiple re-reads, 10% to straighten out the crooked lines, 90% to savor and think about them. ( )
  Smokler | Jan 3, 2021 |
Reading Better Living Through Criticism gave me exactly the same cramped and unpleasant feeling that I got from reading Richard Dawkins's [b:The God Delusion|14743|The God Delusion|Richard Dawkins|https://d.gr-assets.com/books/1347220693s/14743.jpg|3044365]: I wanted serious inquiry and instead felt pummeled and bullied into a corner by poorly argued dogma.

At times Scott begins his argument about the uses of criticism with a false axiomatic principle--usually a belief that I don't ascribe to, but that Scott says I do ("everyone knows that critics are failed artists, and let me tell you why you're wrong to think so").

And sometimes he does the opposite, taking his own beliefs as universally accepted, because he thinks they're true, and not even bothering to tell me why I should also believe the same way.

So I as a reader end up feeling pushed around, not convinced.

I also resented the folksy/apologetic tone Scott adopts. As I read, I kept thinking: "if you want me to think about your ideas seriously then you need to take your ideas seriously, yourself." A critic who tries to sound dumb and average not only demeans himself but also demeans me as a reader.

The decision to write this book as a faux Socratic dialogue also failed, for me, because the questions asked in the dialogue are somewhat dopy and disingenuous. They reminded me of the questions you might find in a marketing brochure that are there to lead customers to buy your product and reject competing products.

Hence the dreaded 2 star review from me (2 stars being my least favorite read)--there is not enough meaty argument here even to hate this book to a one-star level; there is just enough to bore and to annoy. ( )
  poingu | Feb 22, 2020 |
A.O. Scott makes his living through criticism as chief film critic at the New York Times. So it’s entirely possible that the better living spoken of in the title is the one he hopes to achieve through the publication of this thoughtful and wide-ranging book on the practice and purpose of criticism. Everyone, says Scott, is a critic. That’s how we engage with the works of artistic creation that are presented before us. Some people are also journalists — writers paid by the word or hired to be on staff by periodicals. A critic, in the sense Scott is primarily interested, is a journalist who engages with works of artistic creation. When he or she does this very well (yes, criticism can also be done poorly), the prose that the critic produces attains the level of art itself. Which raises the question of whether this book reaches those lofty heights.

Scott offers six chapters considering aspects of criticism and the role of the critic. These read like chatty public lectures, with sufficient nods to the long tradition of criticism (and of artistic creations) to present as erudite, but enough asides and digressions to never be mistaken for deep thought. He regularly deploys full paragraphs of rhetorical questions, but presumably only as a rhetorical flourish. And to further deflate any grandiose posturing, Scott intersperses his lecture chapters with dialogues, question and answer sessions between himself and himself in which he takes himself to task on various points and also tries to defend himself. These might be considered light relief though in fact their tone and tenor is very much in keeping with the rest of the book. Scott is well-read and well-educated (though not a scholar), and he writes with great facility and verve. (He’s rather like an American James Wood.) So all of this is diverting reading even if it doesn’t really get beyond the superficial.

A case in point is his second chapter, “The Eye of the Beholder.” Here he approaches the heart of the problem. If everyone’s opinion is just a matter of taste (and there’s no accounting for taste), then all we can ever have is the cacophony of competing opinions. But the critic must maintain that there is more to art than his or her own prejudices. The critic says that the object under discussion (poem, play, film, painting, etc.) has features in which its beauty (if it has beauty) inheres. In drawing attention to these, the critic is pointing to something that can be discerned by anyone (perhaps with sufficient training) and, moreover, each of us ought to reach the corresponding judgment. Scott is drawing explicitly on Kant’s Critique of Judgment here. It is, I think, the starting point for any serious exploration of the validity or potential significance for criticism. Yet, having acknowledged Kant as the clearest characterizer of the problem, a few pages later Scott declares “that philosophy and science are of limited use in addressing these questions.” I don’t know why. Perhaps he felt he had delved as deep as he was capable. But that’s not a reason to think that philosophy is of limited use; it’s a reason to clear the field so that philosophers can get on with the hard work to be done.

But perhaps I’m hoping for more than what Scott set out to achieve with this book, despite its aspirational sub-title. It remains an amiable book which deserves to be gently recommended, especially if you’ve never seriously considered these issues before. Besides, you can’t help but like someone who is so enamoured of the Pixar film Ratatouille! ( )
  RandyMetcalfe | Apr 17, 2016 |
1-5 van 6 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels (2)

"The New York Times film critic shows why we need criticism now more than everFew could explain, let alone seek out, a career in criticism. Yet what A.O. Scott shows in Better Living Through Criticism is that we are, in fact, all critics: because critical thinking informs almost every aspect of artistic creation, of civil action, of interpersonal life. With penetrating insight and warm humor, Scott shows that while individual critics--himself included--can make mistakes and find flaws where they shouldn't, criticism as a discipline is one of the noblest, most creative, and urgent activities of modern existence.Using his own film criticism as a starting point--everything from his infamous dismissal of the international blockbuster The Avengers to his intense affection for Pixar's animinated Ratatouille--Scott expands outward, easily guiding readers through the complexities of Rilke and Shelley, the origins of Chuck Berry and the Rolling Stones, the power of Marina Abramovich and 'Ode on a Grecian Urn.' Drawing on the long tradition of criticism from Aristotle to Susan Sontag, Scott shows that real criticism was and always will be the breath of fresh air that allows true creativity to thrive. "The time for criticism is always now," Scott explains, "because the imperative to think clearly, to insist on the necessary balance of reason and passion, never goes away.""--

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.23)
0.5
1 3
1.5
2 3
2.5
3 11
3.5 1
4 10
4.5 1
5 2

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 203,198,270 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar