StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons,…
Bezig met laden...

Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons, and Aggression (origineel 1989; editie 1989)

door Robert L. O'Connell

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingAanhalingen
1873144,451 (3.59)1
The appearance of the crossbow on the European battle field in A.D. 1100 as the weapon of choice for shooting down knights threatened the status quo of medieval chivalric fighting techniques. By 1139 the Church had intervened, outlawing the use of the crossbow among Christians. Withthis edict, arms control was born. As Robert L. O'Connell reveals in this vividly written history of weapons in Western culture, that first attempt at an arms control measure characterizes the complex and often paradoxical relationship between men and arms throughout the centuries. In a sweeping narrative that ranges fromprehistoric times to the nuclear age, O'Connell demonstrates how social and economic conditions determine the types of weapons and the tactics used in warfare and how, in turn, innovations in weapons technology often undercut social values. He describes, for instance, how the invention of the gunrequired a redefinition of courage from aggressive ferocity to calmness under fire; and how the machine gun in World War I so overthrew traditional notions of combat that Lord Kitchener exclaimed, "This isn't war!" The technology unleashed during the Great War radically altered our perceptions ofourselves, as these new weapons made human qualities almost irrelevant in combat. With the invention of the atomic bomb, humanity itself became subservient to the weapons it had produced. Of Arms and Men brilliantly integrates the evolution of politics, weapons, strategy, and tactics into a coherent narrative, one spiced with striking portraits of men in combat and penetrating insights into why men go to war.… (meer)
Lid:OldSarge
Titel:Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons, and Aggression
Auteurs:Robert L. O'Connell
Info:Oxford University Press, USA (1989), Hardcover, 384 pages
Verzamelingen:Jouw bibliotheek
Waardering:
Trefwoorden:Military Science, Military History

Informatie over het werk

Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons, and Aggression door Robert L. O'Connell (1989)

Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 1 vermelding

Toon 3 van 3
Why do humans make war? Is it genetically pre-determined? What lessons of early warfare can we apply to present day conditions?
Robert O'Connell attempts to answer these and many other questions

0' Connell argues that man's creation of weapons is biologically defensible. Most animals developed some form of self-defense mechanism, be it fangs, claws or, in the case of crustaceans, body armor. Intraspecies combat is characterized by symmetrically balanced weaponry and battle follows a specific set of rules. Man's history of weaponry is an attempt to overcome symmetry in battle: the ever-increasing search for the ultimate, or better weapon which will provide the edge in combat. Deterrence itself has biological parallels in the increased ritualization of battle and the insertion of bluff, i.e. animals who try to appear larger than life when faced with aggression. This parallels a country's desire to appear (if not actually be) stronger than the opponent to prevent attack, at least in theory.

War, itself, began some 7000-9000 years ago largely as a result of changes in the nomadic lifestyle, the development of agriculture and a more village-oriented society. O'Connell postulates that about this time the concept of property arose as people had more food than they needed. Control implied ownership. Thus politics and property became the keys to societal conflict.

Ironically many of the civilizations we now admire for their cultural achievements (Greece, Rome, etc.) were acclaimed by their contemporaries for their war-making abilities. It was not until the 17th century that dominance by one state over another was achieved by some means other than war (economics and commercial trade.) Despite O'Connell's overemphasis on biological comparisons, the book makes intriguing parallels between ancient war and that of today; the desire for bigger and better weapons for example. Ptolemy V built a gargantuan warship which totally outclassed anything at the time. It was 450 feet in length, had a 57 foot beam, carried 4000 oarsmen, 400 deckhands, and 2800 marines but was worthless militarily. It reminds one of the nuclear airplane of the 50's or perhaps the Stealth bomber.

Another interesting parallel is the 1139 Edict of the 2nd Ecumenical Lateran Council which outlawed the use of the crossbow, (except in its use against Muslims, of course,) perhaps the first attempt at arms control. The crossbow was an extremely effective weapon, strong enough to penetrate the armor of a mounted knight. As it was relatively inexpensive, it enabled the lowly foot soldier to destroy the mounted aristocracy threatening the power structure supported by the church. The current attempts to prevent small nations from obtaining nuclear weapons raises similar issues.

Revised 5/9/09 ( )
  ecw0647 | Sep 30, 2013 |
With a theme of intraspecies lethal predation vs. intraspecies ritual nonlethal combat, this is an excellent review of war, weapons, and fighting throughout Earth history (animal warfare initiates the discussion). Even though I didn't completely agree with the author's viewpoints, the detailed presentation of the history of weapons and fighting was clear and vivid. (Especially the bit about the Duke of Parma having lunch during a siege, when a cannonball rips right across the table killing some guests, and he insists on finishing the meal once the table is tidied up.)
The author discusses phalanxes, pikemen, archers, infantry, cavalry, arquebuses, muskets, guns, rifles, ramming ships, sailing ships, battleships, aircraft carriers, machine guns, and fighter planes.
A big point is made of the transition to "chemical-based" weaponry, by which he means guns and bombs, and how this initially led to a volume of slaughter that wasn't intended, that fighting between members of the same species is naturally just of the bluff and show variety, like two rams hitting their heads against each other, or gorillas beating their chests. ( )
  br77rino | Aug 1, 2009 |
Toon 3 van 3
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels (2)

The appearance of the crossbow on the European battle field in A.D. 1100 as the weapon of choice for shooting down knights threatened the status quo of medieval chivalric fighting techniques. By 1139 the Church had intervened, outlawing the use of the crossbow among Christians. Withthis edict, arms control was born. As Robert L. O'Connell reveals in this vividly written history of weapons in Western culture, that first attempt at an arms control measure characterizes the complex and often paradoxical relationship between men and arms throughout the centuries. In a sweeping narrative that ranges fromprehistoric times to the nuclear age, O'Connell demonstrates how social and economic conditions determine the types of weapons and the tactics used in warfare and how, in turn, innovations in weapons technology often undercut social values. He describes, for instance, how the invention of the gunrequired a redefinition of courage from aggressive ferocity to calmness under fire; and how the machine gun in World War I so overthrew traditional notions of combat that Lord Kitchener exclaimed, "This isn't war!" The technology unleashed during the Great War radically altered our perceptions ofourselves, as these new weapons made human qualities almost irrelevant in combat. With the invention of the atomic bomb, humanity itself became subservient to the weapons it had produced. Of Arms and Men brilliantly integrates the evolution of politics, weapons, strategy, and tactics into a coherent narrative, one spiced with striking portraits of men in combat and penetrating insights into why men go to war.

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.59)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 5
3.5
4 2
4.5 1
5 2

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 203,222,573 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar