StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Bezig met laden...

Murder Mystery Party Case Files: Mile High Murder (2022)

door Bruce Whitehill

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingDiscussies
215,252,109 (2)Geen
Onlangs toegevoegd doormissterrienation
Geen
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

This murder mystery game was fun until the end when it became more of an aggravation.

This is a game in which the players read a variety of materials from a ‘case file’ which provides the details and clues to the solution of a murder. By reading the investigators’ notes, news articles, witness statements, etc., the players should be able to identify the culprit.

In Mile High Murder, the mystery surrounds the poisoning death of artist, Marisa Hightower, on a flight to London. Marisa is en route to receive her share of her former husband’s vast estate. Most of the other heirs named in the will are on the flight, too. But, whodunit?

My family really enjoyed reading through all of the materials & discussing all of the possible suspects, motives, & potential scenarios for the murder. For the most part, it was an entertaining way to spend quality family time around the dinner table…until we reached the end, then we all grew irritable & grumpy for three very specific reasons.

First, going into the analysis of the ‘case file’ we were all expecting there would be one or two definitive clues insidiously hidden within the materials that would make the identity of the murderer absolutely clear. There weren’t.
There is no “smoking gun” in this game, & players are left guessing who is most likely rather than who IS the killer. All of the suspects have the exact same motive, means, and opportunity for committing the crime.
We’re old hats at fictional mystery solving so we managed to narrow it down to the two most likely suspects, but—for the most part—this turned out to be a guessing game rather than a figure out the solution game. That was very disappointing.

Second (& worst of all), the game requires players to go online to verify the accuracy (or inaccuracy) of their final solution, and it is completely unnecessary. The epilogue and the final exonerations (or guilt) for each suspect could easily have been included in envelopes within the physical case folder, but, no. Players have to go online to see if their solution to the crime is correct. What a ridiculous nuisance!
Here we are as a family, sitting around the dinner table, enjoying each other’s company, laughing and discussing the documents outlining the mystery story, wondering if our final guess is the correct one…and, boom, we have to get a technological gadget involved because someone has to go to the computer or drag his phone out to go to the company’s website to read the solution which should just be in the game box in the first place. I can’t describe how irritating that was. Good way to kill family fun night, University Games!

(The website also supposedly contains additional clues to help you in case you get stuck. That is such a joke; these so-called additional clues just re-hash info that is already obvious from the case file. Such a waste of time.)

Third & finally, the individual explanations for why the suspects are guilty or innocent of the crime in question actually contained ‘facts’ that made no sense, or that actually contradicted facts outlined in the physical ‘case file’. It’s like there were several different people involved in creating this mystery, & they couldn’t be bothered to coordinate the clues and the story details with one another so they just wrote what they wanted to with complete disregard to what was going on with the rest of the game. Consequently. the information in the final summations online actually has nothing to do with the information provided in the ‘case file’; the end result is absolute chaos.

For us, although we enjoyed the initial interaction with the ‘case file’ and our discussion of the materials and possible solutions, we did not appreciate having to go online and we certainly felt like all of our efforts were wasted because the online story went against the info we had just spent the past several hours deliberating.

The spirit of the game was a blast, but its execution was a big let down. We received another version of this game series as a gift, so we’ll be playing it at some point over Christmas. However, I would never buy another game from this company again. ( )
  missterrienation | Nov 30, 2022 |
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Belangrijke plaatsen
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (2)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 204,506,279 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar