StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Bezig met laden...

Fires That Destroy (1951)

door Harry Whittington

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingDiscussies
433584,675 (3.5)Geen
Geen
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

Toon 3 van 3
Very good to fine
  ChrisAllan | Aug 21, 2019 |
Whittington was known as the “king of the paperbacks” and published in excess of 170 paperback novels in his lifetime. “Fires that Destroy” is a pulp crime novel, but it is not your classic action-packed crime
story. And, don’t read it expecting to be kept in suspense. There’s little
question from the first pages who is the killer or why or what the various characters will end up being. The novel is not about the action so much as the psychological motivations of the main character, Bernice Harper. In Joe Lansdale’s introduction to the novel, “Fires that Destroy” is compared to the great Cain novels, which pick apart
characters and show their descent into worlds of guilt and compromise.

Even though this novel is a character study rather than an wham-bam action story, it is somehow compelling and, once I started reading, it became very difficult to put down. The questions you are left with after
reading this are whether Bernice is to sympathized with or not. Is she simply a horrible person motivated by greed and lust or is she thrust into this situation by how society has treated her. She suffers from “ugly duckling syndrome” and thinks other women have always gotten
their way because of their looks and their figure and that she has suffered in comparison because she is somewhat lacking in the looks and appeal. Is this a justification for murder? Is it a justification for buying her way to happiness?
Is she somewhat out of her mind? Even when she is put in a good situation- being a companion to a rich, handsome blind man – she can’t trust that he would have picked her if he had sight and she
“hated herself because it was a joke to pawn her off as a looker on a man who couldn’t see her.”

In the end, is she just a sad case of someone to be pitied or has the
narrator fooled you into thinking this person who is motivated by uncontrollable lust and greed is someone decent if but for the way people look at her or if but for the men she picked or bought. “She grew up determined to have all the things she’d been denied,” Whittington explains. “To want was one thing – that was hell. To be
wanted – that was all that mattered. Her eyes filled with tears. Without that, you had nothing.”

It is, at base, a novel of obsession: “When finally you admit that you are going to kill a man, your obsession take over. You begin to plan how you can do it – and get away with it.” But, does the obsession go
away or are you forever haunted by guilt and shame for what you did.

Do you always think everyone suspects you or everyone is after you? How far can you run? How far can you hide from those nightmare eyes that keep haunting you?
This is a terrific novel and it makes you wonder why Whittington was not more widely recognized as one of the great American writers of the
mid-twentieth century. ( )
  DaveWilde | Sep 22, 2017 |
After an encouraging start that promises a battle of wits between a clever detective and a murderer, this book detours into a story of a woman's sad quest for love and fulfillment. There is nothing to admire in the female protagonist, however, and as the book proceeds her actions become more and more ridiculous. The man she falls in love with and obsesses over is no better. In fact, after the book's opening nearly all of the characters we encounter are corrupt. This is a noir novel of course, but despite the author's generally good writing style, the story simply doesn't engage the reader and provide the type of pleasure it should. It is simply too cold and mean-spirited. Better stories of this type provide at least one or two sympathetic characteristics for their main characters. This book doesn't, and it largely fails as a result. ( )
  datrappert | Nov 25, 2013 |
Toon 3 van 3
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe

Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)

Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Informatie afkomstig uit de Engelse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.5)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 1
3.5
4 1
4.5
5 1

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 204,773,342 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar