This brief but thoughtful book exists midway between history and anthropology, as the author seeks to explore the mindset of Virginia's Tidewater planters in the years leading up to the American Revolution. The agricultural and labor conditions under which tobacco was grown governed the lives of these men: tobacco was a labor-intensive crop to cultivate, required precise conditions to grow, and returned varying degrees of profit as prices fluctuated. These factors directly related to the use of enslaved people to tend to a planter's crops and the increased indebtedness of many planters as they struggled with declining tobacco prices. The cultural picture which emerges helps one to understand why some (but not all) of these men chose to take an active role in the American Revolution. I appreciated this insight, although I do feel there is more to be explored than covered in this book and I hope to find other historians have expanded on the topic. ( )

Mostly about how the tobacco mentality and the resulting debt in Colonial Virginia set up the great Gentlemen to accept and embrace revolution. Many examples, though still a bit (inherently) speculative. Still, very informative. ( )

Why did the great Tidewater planters of Virginia—the great men of the colony—decide to risk their lives and fortunes in support of Revolution? Dr. Breen, a professor of history at Northwestern University, examines the mentality of these planters, and how that mentality became strained to the extent that revolution became acceptable.
Breen argues that understanding 'tobacco culture' is necessary in order to understand these men and their actions. Tobacco was not just a crop; everything on the plantation revolved around it. Even the calendar they used to mark their days revolved around the planting, cutting, and curing of the tobacco crop (45). It was the nature of tobacco that it took a year to produce a good crop, and, to a large extent, the worthiness of the crop depended upon the planter's skill and experience. Indeed, many planters wore (or aspired to wear) the title of 'crop master' as a badge of honor (62).
The Virginians' experience with debt and credit also shaped how they view the world. Within the colony, extending loans or credit to your peers was seen has a duty, something that one had to do to preserve his honor (94-95). This 'debt etiquette' allowed each person—lender and debtor—to preserve his public honor. The planters projected this ritualistic system upon the London merchants with whom they consigned their tobacco. They expected the merchants to sell their tobacco and send them merchandise in return; if the return on their tobacco was not enough to meet their obligations, than the 'gentlemanly' thing to do was to provide credit. The planters imagined these merchants as 'friends' who understood how to provide credit and manage debt in an 'honorable' fashion. Most merchants were ignorant of exactly how the market worked, and when their debts were called in, reacted as if they had been betrayed. (84-86).
As the market for tobacco faltered during the 1760s and 1770s, these merchants were more insistent in calling for repayment of debt, forcing the planter elite to abandon their old concerns for preserving a 'debt etiquette' and call on their peers to repay their local obligations (166). The 'tobacco culture' began to change; merchants were no longer viewed as overseas friends. Debt, viewed casually before, began to be seriously viewed as a real threat to their independence. When Parliament enacted taxes after the French and Indian War, this agrarian discontent was transformed into political protest. From there, many planters easily moved for a complete break with the political and economic system that threatened their independence and their personal honor (202-203).
Breen uses many sources to strengthen his argument—letters, diaries, and court proceedings—that the shifting mentality of the planter class helped push Virginia towards Revolution. He successfully creates for us a window into the mind of the planter elite, and provides us with a sometimes very personal view of history that is sometimes lacking from the more impersonal historical surveys. Breen succeeds admirably in demonstrating the importance of understanding how historical actors think and why they act. Only by understanding these things can we truly understand history.