Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Submersion journalism : reporting in the radical first person from Harper's magazine (editie 2008)door Bill Wasik
Informatie over het werkSubmersion Journalism: Reporting in the Radical First Person from Harper's Magazine door Bill Wasik
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
"Submersion journalism" happens when a reporter dares to see a story from the inside: to participate in the events at hand, sometimes undercover, and then to tell the tale from a distinct point of view rather than pretend to some ideal of objectivity. During the Bush years, Harper's correspondents infiltrated the Republican machine, from its lowliest canvassing operation to its corporate and evangelical elite, and they posed as shady clients for sleazy blue-chip lobbying firms. They shot machine guns, lounged in Vegas brothels, and peered into secret tunnels in Mexicali. They terrorized art museums and touched off worldwide fads. Here are some of the best examples of participatory reporting published in the past decade, called "brilliant work" by the Los Angeles Times. Contributors: Charles Bowden Adam Davidson Barbara Ehrenreich Steve Featherstone Kristoffer A. Garin Gary Greenberg Roger D. Hodge Jay Kirk Willem Marx Morgan Meis Jeff Sharlet Jake Silverstein Ken Silverstein Wells Tower William T. Vollmann Bill Wasik Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)071.3Information Journalism And Publishing North America United StatesLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
What happens can be compelling, but isn't necessarily good. Conflict is necessary for a good story, and in all of the cases in this book, the conflict comes from the reporters infiltrating groups/cultures/families they are on some level inherently opposed to. Whether it's the Bush campaign, mysterious religious group "The Family," or men on a bride hunt in Ukraine, each writer is snarky and disdainful of his or her surroundings.
Each story (with a few incoherent exceptions) is fairly interesting, but reading report after report in the same self-righteous and judging tone gets to be oppressive. This is definitely a book to be read in small chunks. ( )