Patrick Coby
Auteur van Thomas Cromwell: Machiavellian Statecraft and the English Reformation
Over de Auteur
J. Patrick Coby is professor of government at Smith College.
Fotografie: Smith College profile picture.
Werken van Patrick Coby
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Officiële naam
- Coby, John Patrick
- Pseudoniemen en naamsvarianten
- Coby, J. Patrick
- Geboortedatum
- 1948
- Geslacht
- male
- Nationaliteit
- USA
- Opleiding
- University of Dallas (BA|English)
University of Dallas (MA, PhD|Political Science) - Beroepen
- Professor of Government
- Organisaties
- Smith College
- Korte biografie
- Smith College profile:
I graduated from the University of Dallas with a major in English and a minor in Art. I attended graduate school at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, in City and Regional Planning. But not liking the program, I returned to the University of Dallas to do a Masters and a Ph.D. in Political Science. I taught at Kenyon College in Ohio for five years, then at Idaho State University for two years, before coming to Smith College in 1985. My teaching areas include political philosophy, especially ancient and early modern political philosophy, and American political thought.
I do research and write on some of the major figures of Western political thought: Thucydides, Plato, Aristotle, Machiavelli, Hobbes, Locke, Marx -- and Shakespeare. Future research will focus on American political thought and on the Scottish Enlightenment.
Leden
Besprekingen
This book's subtitle is "Machiavellian Statecraft and the English Reformation," which pretty much sums up the author's argument. It's an adequate overview of Cromwell's life and accomplishments, and does a satisfactory job of presenting alternative interpretations where the facts and interpretations are contested. Be aware that the author's a political scientist; this book is much more about Cromwell's politics than a proper biography. If that's what you're looking for, this book will fit your purpose.
All the same, it's an odd production. The introduction says the intended audience is college students; one result is the discussion often assumes you're nineteen, have read little history, and know little of politics. This is occasionally annoying. Evidently those nineteen-year-olds are allergic to academic footnotes, as many of the author's assertions are unsourced and (more important) many of the academy's disagreements are briefly described without adequate reference for those who might wish to follow up. This is somewhat mitigated by the last chapter, which is a fine essay on Cromwellian historiography, and by an annotated bibliographic essay. Neither, though, helps if you're interested in following up a specific assertion.
Another strangeness: While there are no academic footnotes, the book's full of asterisks which refer the reader to two glossaries--one of words and (often technical ecclesiastical) phrases; the other of short biographical sketches. This undermines, to my eye, any argument that traditional academic footnotes are overly intrusive.
The explanation is quite likely that this book began as a series of lectures, which cannot have footnotes but which might be provided with such reference materials. Better, in my opinion, to have supplied the notes retroactively.
This review has also been published on a dabbler's journal.… (meer)
All the same, it's an odd production. The introduction says the intended audience is college students; one result is the discussion often assumes you're nineteen, have read little history, and know little of politics. This is occasionally annoying. Evidently those nineteen-year-olds are allergic to academic footnotes, as many of the author's assertions are unsourced and (more important) many of the academy's disagreements are briefly described without adequate reference for those who might wish to follow up. This is somewhat mitigated by the last chapter, which is a fine essay on Cromwellian historiography, and by an annotated bibliographic essay. Neither, though, helps if you're interested in following up a specific assertion.
Another strangeness: While there are no academic footnotes, the book's full of asterisks which refer the reader to two glossaries--one of words and (often technical ecclesiastical) phrases; the other of short biographical sketches. This undermines, to my eye, any argument that traditional academic footnotes are overly intrusive.
The explanation is quite likely that this book began as a series of lectures, which cannot have footnotes but which might be provided with such reference materials. Better, in my opinion, to have supplied the notes retroactively.
This review has also been published on a dabbler's journal.… (meer)
Statistieken
- Werken
- 4
- Leden
- 47
- Populariteit
- #330,643
- Waardering
- 3.0
- Besprekingen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 13
I read this book back-to-back with Schofield's biography and I found Coby's account of Cromwell's life and his death not only biased but unsubtle. Nothing new is added from what we know trough popular culture, which is a pity, and I was surprised by the author taking things out of context: most notably, the use of the word "Catholic" in the scaffold speech, taken to mean the Roman Church and not the use it was given in Lutheran circles in the 16the century.
Lastly, and something always important to me, the scarce bibliography was frustrating and something I always dislike in non-fiction books.… (meer)