Charlotte Hess

Very mediocre. The theoretical framework was thin, not used coherently throughout the book, didn't take historical practices and understandings into account, and didn't reference the tremendous amount of complementary work available (where were the references to Bourdieu, for instance?). There was a surprising amount of naivete and omission of complexity in the discussion of repositories. Lastly, there was no concluding editorial voice that brought all of the individual chapter contributions together.… (meer)