Leonard Jacobson
Auteur van Words from Silence: An Invitation to Spiritual Awakening
Werken van Leonard Jacobson
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Geboortedatum
- 20th century
- Geslacht
- male
- Nationaliteit
- Australia (birth)
USA
Leden
Besprekingen
Prijzen
Statistieken
- Werken
- 5
- Leden
- 59
- Populariteit
- #280,813
- Waardering
- 4.1
- Besprekingen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 10
…. If you tell the truth, you do well, but the great thing is not to lie. No one can force you to learn French or biology, but whatever you learn, you must not lie. I believe that all chaos comes from people living the life of a lie, whether it’s personal or social chaos. Silence is a stern treatment, it is true. But it works.
…. Obviously it is impossible to know whether Jacobson is really a better teacher than Tolle or not, or whether I just heard him at a better time of life, or whether I was just apt to try mysticism and then reject it the first time, etc, etc. It’s not that important, really.
Jacobson is different from the kinda Stereotypical Mystic (which I guess I assimilated Tolle to), at times, though. Practice is obviously vital, the Mystic Aussie affirms, (not that you’re getting ‘Strine’ from him though, lol, some distinctly Melbourne thing, certainly not), but often action is also required, in this life and across lives maybe, to heal disorders or whatever inherited from the past life. I think Tolle in a similar place in his first book gave teachings about romance and relationships, so, everybody’s different (on the surface).
And, you know, obviously it is what it is. He might say God is Everything, I might say God is in everything; I think both of us acknowledge that we’re not to ignore God anywhere, or see incorrectly everything as an equally clear mirror of God, I don’t know.
But the point is—don’t listen to me, just give back the extra servings of suffering that you’ve taken on, if you can’t put it away, lol.
…. Re: two minutes every two hours (and yes I know I compare a lot too, although this time I won’t hit the mystics over the head with the relative reality of time)
I’m reading Gangaji’s book on ‘stopping’ (Diamond in your pocket—reading it again “for the first time” lol, as the first time I was really just trying to control my body and value my mind, as a controller, for the first time, so all the ‘for a long time you’ve subtly deceived yourself’ went right over my head because…. Because I was on the wrong side of thirty, I guess), and her advice about stopping reminds me of Leonard. So I mean, now I am, maybe when I move from reading in one book to another or something, just to take a few dozen seconds or a minute or something, I don’t count, like, set my watch, Two minutes!, because I guess her point is, we have a ‘practice’ that’s good, like, a formal practice, and also spending time reading or whatever in a permissible way, but there can be this fear and holding on, like the practice is really, I don’t know. I do this and I won’t have to feel the deep fear that I’ll regress or something. So now sometimes I’ll just sit with fear and feel feelings for thirty seconds or two minutes or whatever, so that my practice isn’t just “practicing suffering” and being in control—because then I really would be like the gossipers and the busy-workers, despite being externally more, good, or whatever. Just a more convincing control technique—convincing to me, if not to God.
So anyway I think Leonard kinda says the same thing, in a way, though when he said “two minutes”, it didn’t click for me. I mean, mystics tend to resemble each other very strongly, they’re not as nervously individuated as most people are. They’re all kinda detached and masculine that way (just let it go), but many of those things they say would immediately sound Uber-love-y if you heard women saying it (love, all is love…. The other is yourself), so I mean.
I don’t like concluding sentences.
…. I mean, it’s like Tarot. I do very vague readings on myself, it’s like, What’s missing here? And then I click the button and I get a reading and I look at it and I say, That’s immensely beautiful, and then it’s like, I guess nothing is missing, you know. I don’t have to translate and verbalize and sell like I was doing it for a nervous person for money. I wish even more skilled Taroters would do readings for me like that, but they all assume you know nothing yourself (some of them lie to you like, You’ll meet a girl and you’ll lie to her and you’ll be happy, like, Bad Philosophy), so I stopped going, you know.
But sometimes all you need to do is say, Beautiful!
…. After-word: Actually in my Christianized new age period I understood basically nothing about tarot, lol. I still almost get what I was saying in that paragraph.
I also disagree with my origin of vice thing in that I used the word ‘all’ when it was inappropriate, but I can understand why it was ‘important’ or whatever for me to think that at the time. (Very ironically.)
But I sorta got it, you know; it’s a good book, and I valued it. My life is less, what do you call it, ‘rule of life’, type of thing now—X minutes per day, and/or don’t go X minutes without meditating (Leonard was more the latter), but I do realize sometimes when I’m insufficiently rooted, and need to change my consciousness. I’ve recently started using crystals for that, which clearly isn’t Leonard’s thing…. It’s a horse of a different color, right.
But Leonard is fundamentally a very good writer, very true, and I might read him again.… (meer)