Freda LightfootBesprekingen

A young woman, Abbie, returns to her family's home in England following her mother's death. Abbie's family blames her for her mother's death, but the real reason her mother died remains a mystery, possibly connected to the big secret her grandmother, Millie, has kept from everyone. Millie spent several years in Russia working as a governess for an aristocratic family, during the last few years before the Revolution, a story she has not told anyone in any detail before. As Millie finally tells her granddaughter about her past adventures in Russia, the truth of her mother's death comes out.

This was a well crafted novel, with the modern family drama providing a nice frame for an interesting bit of historical fiction that shows life in Russia during the build-up to the revolution from the perspective of the aristocracy. I wished that Abbie was a bit better informed so she could have understood more of what was happening around her, but the fact that she was so clueless about Russian current events and politics was believable.

I received this book through Goodreads free kindle giveaway. Thank you! This book is a reminder of how brave women were during war times. It is a story well worth reading. It keeps your interest with the in depth stories of the characters. It covered the lives of various friends in the war but also went forward in time showing how it impacted the rest of their lives. Truly enjoyable read.

I received a copy from NetGalley for an honest review. This was such a wonderful story of three women whose lives are intertwined during the Spanish War. As the story progresses, you see how tightly woven their stories are and how much tragedy, conflict, and upheaval they had to endure. It was like a puzzle, where the author gave you pieces and you attempted to figure out how the picture would develop. It was beautifully written.

‘The cave, the cave,’ yelled Jonathon. Fay appeared with a wriggling Carrie desperate to escape the confines of her pushchair. ‘Can we come too?’ her sister-in-law asked, her tone revealing her own eagerness to escape for a while.

DNF.

The Amber Keeper was recommended to me by a friend and I really wanted to like it. Not least because I had not enjoyed her previous recommendation all that much either.
So, deciding to DNF was - and this is unusual for me - hard.

So, anyway, why did the book not work for me?
Well, The Amber Keeper tells the story set in the 1960s of Abbie, an un-wed single mother who returns to the Lake District for her mother's funeral. In the aftermath of the funeral and the squabble about inheritance etc. Abbie spends a lot of time talking to her grandmother and finds out about her gran's time in Russia during the years of the Revolution.
I really like the premise of the plot. What I had an issue with was the delivery.

Let the book speak for itself:

"Abbie felt a sudden hopelessness overwhelm her as she sat gazing out of her bedroom window, her transistor radio playing Andy Williams singing Can’t Get Used To Losing You, which was exactly how she felt right now. To lose her mother just when she needed her most, needed that much-longed-for reconciliation, was more than she could bear. How cruel life was at times. If only she possessed her grandmother’s strength. She watched the whooper swans preparing to leave Carreckwater for their summer breeding grounds on the Arctic tundra. How far those beautiful birds must have to travel, and to a region even colder than this one. Rather as Millie had done when she’d sailed to Russia."

Why is it important that Andy Williams gets a mention?
Why the reference to her grandmother's strength? This is before her gran reveals her story in the book, and up to this point there are only vague references about family secrets - and not much about her gran.

And most important - and most annoying to me - why do I need to know that whooper swans have summer breeding grounds in the Arctic tundra? I'm sorry, but unless the swans feature in the story, I do not want to read about their summer breeding grounds.

(Btw, I checked - there are no further references to the swans. So, why....?)

So, puzzled, I continued to find this:

" ‘Sorry I didn’t manage to call yesterday, Gran, only we took the children out on Coniston Water for a treat.’ ‘Good for you. Cheer you all up, I expect.’ ‘Indeed it did.’ Abbie sipped her coffee as the two lapsed into a comfortable silence, watching a house martin flying frantically to and fro as it gathered material for its nest."

I think the author may be a twitcher. Nothing wrong with that, of course, but it does not move the story forward or create any of the much needed atmosphere. Nor do the references seem to be metaphors for anything. So, still puzzled I read on.

"Both women lapsed into silence for a moment as they recalled happier days, then Abbie gave a little sigh.
‘I still can’t get my head around why Mum would do this. It’s quite beyond my comprehension. But then she was never easy to understand.’
‘It’s true she was rather a complicated person, a bit screwed up, as you young people would say. But then she had a lot to deal with, not knowing exactly who she was, for one thing.’
‘That must have been awful for her.’
‘I’m afraid it did trouble her greatly.’
Abbie tried to recall when first she’d learned that her mother had been adopted, perhaps when she was being something of a problem during her own teen years. Kate had told her that she considered herself fortunate to have enjoyed a good upbringing with loving parents, which included being privately educated at a local girls’ school, when she could so easily have suffered a deprived childhood confined in an orphanage."

It was at this point that I had to laugh. I mean, it can be difficult to convey to readers how characters might feel, but fear not - in this book, the author does an awesome job at telling you exactly what people think and feel and why they do it.
Incidentally, when trying to contrast growing up at an orphanage with growing up in a loving family - who cares about the private education at a local girls school?

From here the reading became less laugh out loud and more strenuous because of the amount of eye-rolling I felt compelled to engage in. So, at risk of causing permanent damage from eye-strain I decided to skim through the rest of the book and see if it does get better. Then the following caught my attention:

" ‘Good for you. Amber is beautiful, likened to the sun because of its colour and clarity. There are many myths and legends attached to it, not least that it is considered to possess healing properties, often worn by children when they are teething. And significantly it is a symbol of fidelity, meant to represent everlasting love,’ Millie said with a smile.
‘Oh, I like that. We could do with a bit more fidelity in this world, judging by all the scandalous goings-on in this Profumo affair. What his lovely wife feels about her MP husband sleeping with a woman who is also having it off with a Russian diplomat, I dread to think. Poor woman!’
‘Windmill girls, or so they think, and the dreadful scandal is having to be carefully kept from Lady Astor that her son has become an innocent victim in the affair, a scapegoat in fact, just because he allowed Stephen Ward to use a cottage on the Cliveden estate."

How do you get from making jewelry to the Profumo Affair? And most importantly - WHY??? It has nothing whatsoever to do with story - and none of it is ever mentioned again. (I checked.)

Is it just thrown in there the give the story a sense of being set in the early 1960s? If so, why not do this by setting the scene rather than by throwing a reference to a political scandal that most people outside of the UK have not heard of?

And for what it's worth, don't get me started on "poor" Lord and Lady Astor. How could they not have know what was going on at Cliveden. They were there!

Anyway, I'm digressing - much like the book. Unlike the book, however, I'm not trying to tell a story.

In summary, The Amber Keeper is an interesting story but the patronising, over-explaining, info-dumping, tell-rather-than-show kind of writing drove me nuts!

Quick easy read very loose historical fiction.
Not my type of read. Typical multiple lovers misunderstandings getting in the way of their true happiness only to be resolved in the end with happy ever after- kinda sappy romance/ little mystery that I am sure many other women would love.

Where are all the reviews for this one? I thought that this was a great book. Here we have two tales interwoven. Abbie’s story in the present and her grandmother’s story in the past. The transitions back and forth are smooth as we discover her grandmother’s secrets and find out who her mother really was. The book is full of intrigue and mysteries. The characters are real and believable and the story line is a good one and kept my interest. I was taken with this book from the start. The writer has a nice writing style and the story flows along. It has enough action to keep you engrossed. The whole book is interesting, but the ending is the best part. We have here two very strong women in two different time periods. I give this one a 5 out of 5.

Chock-full of twists and secrets and delicious discoveries, spanning time and countries. And the revelations right at the end are the happiest ones of all! See full review at www.bubblebath-books.com

This started off well and picked up again near the end, but the middle just dragged on and on. The characters were entirely one-dimensional and seemed to just keep making the same mistakes over, and over, and over again... ok so that's what actually happened, but there's no suggestion or exploration of the reasons for this.

And I found it a bit distracting that at the end the writing style completely changes when describing the events of the day leading up to you-know-what (won't say as it's a spoiler). It's like the author is paraphrasing a history book here, and it's really obvious what's coming up (although if you know your history you would know that anyway).

On the plus side, the book was fine as a light read, and now I want to know more about Queen Margot.½

A light read, but nothing special. Margot's actions and desires, such as her love for de Guise and and her sudden respect for Navarre upon becoming his wife aren't well grounded in character development.

I do not like Henriette. "OFF WITH HER HEAD" kept running through my mind while reading this book. I have a soft spot for the Medici women, they were pawns in the political games of the times. Marie de Medici is no exception.
This is actually the third book in a series. I encourage you to read all three. Not much is written about this time period, and Ms Lightfoot has done a great job with her research. Book one is THE HOSTAGE QUEEN and deals with Henry of Navarre and his wife Margot, Book two is THE RELUCTANT QUEEN and we meet Gabrielle d'Estrees and of course, book three
THE QUEEN AND THE COURTESAN deals with Henry IV and his wife, Marie de Medici and his mistress Henriette d'Entragues.

4 weeks into her marriage, Carly, finds herself struggling to understand the darker side she has discovered to her new husband. As Carly struggles to find an escape, Oliver continues to absue her, undermine her with her family and friends and take her independence. When Oliver hurts their daughter Carly accepts that she has no option but to escape. With the help of family and friends Carly is able to take steps to get her life back but Oliver is not quite finished with her.