Afbeelding auteur
4 Werken 211 Leden 17 Besprekingen

Besprekingen

Engels (16)  Spaans (1)  Alle talen (17)
Toon 17 van 17
Esta es la historia de dos personajes legendarios, Ricardo Corazón de León y Saladino, enfrentados en una guerra implacable por la posesión de la misma tierra y el amor de la misma mujer. Miriam, una joven judía con un pasado trágico, es el amor prohibido del sultán Saladino. Cuando el rey cristiano la captura, los dos hombres más poderosos de la Tierra se verán las caras en una cruzada personal que determinará el futuro de toda una civilización.
 
Gemarkeerd
Natt90 | Dec 13, 2022 |
The origins of Islam.
This was pretty much compulsory reading, considering that I live in the Middle East, and it was a book that has been on my shelves for quite a while. However, although it was interesting, it certainly wasn't un-putdownable - checking back I see that it has taken me over 2 months to read. It's quite a big book and I was moving house, but even so, that's a looong time.

The central character is Muhammad's first wife, Aisha, and the book goes beyond Muhammad's death to the caliphs who ruled after his passing, but during Aisha's lifetime. There is debate about how old Aisha was at the time of her marriage and it was the author's choice to take the youngest age, at just nine years old. I found, however, that her thoughts and conversation seemed more suited to an older person and this caused me some conflict in the earlier chapters.

Muhammad (pbuh), was an interesting character, more of a warrior than I had realised, but also a man of peace, with amazing negotiating skills. He held together a warring mix of tribes, against all odds, and gave generously of all he had, to the poor.

It is a shame that religions become warped to people's own ends. Islam teaches generosity and love, not the fanaticism that we see today. The early believers would turn in their graves if they could see what has happened since.

This was a book group read and I was fortunate to have some Muslim friends in my book group, who explained some of the narrative and put it into context within today's world.

I do think this is a book worth reading and although it took me a while, I don't regret the time spent. I am now much better informed about the origins of the Islamic faith and the history behind it.
 
Gemarkeerd
DubaiReader | 10 andere besprekingen | Jan 6, 2019 |
If you understand that the author's premise is that all gods are the same, that Alleh, Yahweh and Christ is the same God, then you can reach the same conclusion that he did. That we should all get along and not fight.

If you have read the Koran and the Moslem's doctrine, you know they do not allow others to co-exist with them.

If you have read the Torah, you know Israel's God is a jealous God and does not share with others.
If you know Christ, He has said, "I am the only way."

The premise of seeing our differences and yet knowing we are trying to live nicely and worship some god is very strong in the book. A nice fiction premise, but not based on the doctrines of any one of the groups presented in the book.

The author did present an interesting view of the Crusaders---uneducated, heathen, destroying everything in their path. Which during war at this time may have been sanctioned.
But his biased view of Moslems co-existing peacefully with Jews because of the same God has never shown in true history.

There were scenes I completely skipped for its bedroom activity. Other sections I did skip as well.

The book caused me to think. Disturbed me, until I realized his premise, and put a desire to read more about the Crusades.
 
Gemarkeerd
Sonya.Contreras | 4 andere besprekingen | May 21, 2017 |
Ein auf jeden Fall gelungener historischer Roman, über die Entstehung und Verbreitung des Islam.
Das Buch gibt einem die Möglichkeit, den Islam aus einer anderen Perspektive zu betrachten. Man erhält einen Einblick in das Leben des Propheten Mohammed und das Leben seiner Frauen, allen voran Aischa, die seine Lieblingsfrau war.
Liebe, Eifersucht, Hass, Religion, Krieg und Politik werden in dem über 600 Seiten Schmöker behandelt.
Das ist mein erster historischer Roman zu dem Thema Islam und daher kann ich keine Vergleiche ziehen, jedoch finde ich dass "Aischa und Mohammed" ein sehr aufschlussreiches Buch ist, dass dem Leser die Möglichkeit gibt, das Herz des Islams kennen- und verstehen zu lernen.

Über den Inhalt des Buches möchte ich hier nichts schreiben, da ich ansonsten spoilern müsste. Daher am Besten selber lesen.
 
Gemarkeerd
Bella2786 | 10 andere besprekingen | Dec 25, 2016 |
Couldn't get into it. I'm sure it's very informative, it was just very dull.½
 
Gemarkeerd
ormondbeach | 10 andere besprekingen | Sep 16, 2013 |
The famous Muslim leader Saladin believes that he has finally driven the Christian crusaders from Israel's shores. The King of Jerusalem has surrendered, most other nobles have gone home, and there's only a small, stubborn contingent to deal with outside the town of Acre. Newly-crowned King Richard I of England (Richard the Lionheart) sees this as his chance to win everlasting fame and glory. He rallies his forces to travel back to Israel and try again. With his brilliant strategies and fearless leadership, the Muslims won't know what hit them.

I guess in a nutshell you could say that this is the story of the Third Crusade told from a Muslim point of view. I found it incredibly interesting. It's always a little--what's the word?--enlightening to see things from the "enemy's" point of view. This took place so long ago that I didn't go into it feeling invested one way or another. Still, if you learn anything about the Crusades in school in the Western world (and I don't remember learning much), it's probably that the Christian knights were fighting to take the Holy Land back from the "infidels." I found it fascinating to see what the Muslims thought of Westerners at that time. Of course they saw them as infidels also. But they also saw them as dirty, ignorant, and without honor. They were medically and scientifically advanced and I'm guessing that Europeans hadn't progressed past leeches and wouldn't for several hundred years. The book opens with Saladin re-taking Jerusalem. The Christians still living in the city are cowering in fear, knowing how their soldiers had treated the Muslims when they took the city earlier. Saladin makes it clear that he's not going to harm anyone. The war is over, enough people have died, and if you don't harm my people, we won't harm you. That's Saladin's take on things. I'll keep this vague, but it's a very different, horrifying story when the Crusaders win over a city later.

I'll freely admit that I know very little about Islam. I try to keep an open mind about things, so I do know that what we see on the news is just a small group of radicals. Other than that? I don't know much. I do tend to think that women in the religion are awfully repressed. True? Sometimes true? I don't really know. I learned a few things here. I don't watch the news much, but even I've heard the stories about wives being stoned to death by their husbands for adultery. According to this book, the husband has to provide four eyewitnesses before he can punish his wife for that. If he accuses her and can't produce the witnesses, he's the one who's punished. Really? I didn't know that and had to readjust my thinking a little. There's also a line in the book where Saladin says, "The Jews are People of the Book and are protected by our religion. The Holy Prophet, peace be upon him, forbade us to oppress them." Another shocker. With all the fighting that seems to go on between them, I had no idea that was in the religion anywhere. Time to readjust my thinking yet again.

Enough about all that. That's all well and good, but what about the story?

I enjoyed it. There were plenty of twists and turns, and I did manage to restrain myself from cheating and checking Wikipedia to see how things turned out. Saladin became a very real character for me. It's clear that he's a legend in his own time, and even to this day, but his responsibilities weigh heavily on him. He's always trying to do the right thing, but sometimes it's hard to see what that is. He's very much a man who knows his own mind, but he's not too proud to seek the advice of others, no matter the source. Miriam, a completely fictional character, was a strong woman whom I enjoyed reading about. She's lived through unimaginable tragedy. It's left a mark on her soul, but she chooses to live her life to the fullest rather than cower in fear. She speaks her mind at all times and takes brave risks to try to help her people. I also liked William Chinon, another fictional character. He's a Crusader with a conscience. He doesn't feel any need to go on Crusade, but he travels along with his friend King Richard to try to be a voice of reason amid all the madness of war. He doesn't judge people by their beliefs (well, not too much), but rather judges them by their actions. He was a welcome relief from Richard's cruelty, and he was by far the most truly Christian person among those forces. There was one section where this otherwise-prosaic story took on an element of the fantastic to explain some stuff that happened. It was only a few pages, but those pages had big ramifications for the entire war. I wish the author had found a way around the mysticism.

Really, I enjoyed this book on a lot of levels. There are obviously some people who are going to be uncomfortable with the point of view. But if you're curious about stepping into someone else's shoes for a while (assuming you're a Westerner), go ahead and pick this up. It was rather eye-opening for me.

Thanks to the publicist for sending me a copy for review.
 
Gemarkeerd
JG_IntrovertedReader | 4 andere besprekingen | Apr 3, 2013 |
A good read. And it contains very good information, via a semi-fictionalized novel format, about the life of Muhammad and the beginning of Islam. Perhaps because the author is a Hollywood screenwriter and producer, the book read somewhat like a movie to me. I did find the story compelling and the writing was solid but not necessarily literary or poetic.
 
Gemarkeerd
ming.l | 10 andere besprekingen | Mar 31, 2013 |
Good book, I am so glad that I picked this up.
 
Gemarkeerd
lissyavon | 10 andere besprekingen | Oct 2, 2011 |
Let me preface this "review" of my thoughts by stating that there were times when I had personal religious "issues" with this book, but had to tell myself to put all of that aside and simply read this as just a good story. So that's what I tried to do.

The story is told by the central character Aisha, who is known as the "Mother of the Believers", as she was the wife of the prophet Muhammad, the founder of the Muslim religion.

Aisha is an intelligent and strong-willed young child when we are introduced to her. Her father is one of the first followers of Muhammad, The Messenger of God who brought the Muslim religion to the world. The Messenger has a vision that reveals to him that Aisha is to be his wife. By their cultural "rules", Aisha cannot be married to him until she begins her cycles, which is at the tender age of nine.

The story goes on to follow the early years of the Muslim religion-- the battles that occurred, both on the field and in the private lives of The Messenger and his family and followers.

Moments of this book were very difficult to read. There were moments of incredible brutality, and most disturbing is knowing that this is not fantastical brutality, but that these are the types of things that do commonly occur in some other countries, especially areas like Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Aisha's character is strong, courageous and full of life. As just a child, her older half-sister Asma chose the new religion over her own mother.

Aisha and Asma's father, Abu Bakr, is one of the first followers of Islam. He is an honorable man and a loving father who expects a lot of his children.

The Messenger, Muhammad, is a strange mixture. Generally just and peaceable, he can exhibit great cruelty and heartlessness in the name of God.

I know that I prefaced this by saying that I tried to put my own religious views aside and view this simply as a good story. However I have to say that the things that I couldn't get past were the contradictions. You have men professing their faith in God, and using violence and murder to push their agenda. Not simply in defense of themselves, but in offense to gain ground with their religion and to garner more power. This bothered me.

You also had men "preaching" piousness, and at the same time taking young girls as slaves and raping them as war trophies, and keeping mistresses and such. None of this did much in gaining my sympathy. I always viewed the Muslim religion as a peaceful and pacifist and most assuredly pious religion (excluding the extremists who use terror for their own benefit), but this book has actually changed that. Now I'm not sure how I feel about it or what the true nature of the Muslim religion is. However, when it all boils down, it comes to this very basic fact: We're all human. And the author Kamran Pasha does a good job at portraying these characters as very human, just as flawed and vulnerable as the rest of us. Even The Messenger was really just a man.

The book also tells a story of what inspired the "law" that required women to be sheltered behind a veil-- one dealing with a wife of the Messenger of God flirting mercilessly with other men after she allows her jealousies get the best of her. There is a passage that says:

From now on, my life was to become a prison, even when I was not confined to the tiny apartment whose mud walls seemed to be closing in on me. For whenever I ventured out into the sun, my face would be hidden away behind a veil. The bars of my jail would follow me everywhere and were unbreakable, forged from a tiny strip of cotton that was stronger than the mightiest Byzantine steel.


This passage really drove it all home to me-- what it's like to be a woman of this culture. Previously when I saw the elaborate hijab that women are required to wear in many middle eastern areas, I would mainly think of the physical discomfort of doing so: the weight of it, the heat in a stifling climate, the claustrophobia of having cloth sitting on my face all of the time, etc. I don't think that I fully appreciated the psychological/emotional discomfort. How stifling, to never be able to walk down a street and feel the sun on my face. To always feel the weight of the fabric would feel like a straight-jacket to me. It would be psychologically crippling for me. I just don't know how the women do it.

All in all, this was a good book. It was very well-written-- I can't fault the author in that. Most of my issues with the book are personal religious issues or moral issues. The book itself is well thought out and put together, with an exciting storyline that just keeps going and going. Very nice!
1 stem
Gemarkeerd
nfmgirl2 | 10 andere besprekingen | Nov 20, 2010 |
The Middle Ages are my favorite era in history to study. Right now, I should tell you I majored in social studies education. I took as many classes on the medieval period as I could, because I find it fascinating. You've got religious elements, social change, trade, battles, some major historical players, oh heck yeah the Middle Ages are cool. So, when I was offered The Shadow of the Swords by Kamran Pasha, I jumped at the opportunity as a large part of the book focuses on Saladin, who is a military genius and completely fascinating.

The Shadow of the Swords is adult historical fiction set during the Crusades, when it came down to Richard The Lionheart vs. Saladin. With my inclination, this book should have set me on the edge of my seat, however, I think I may have read it at the wrong time for me. First, I wasn't really in the mood to read it, but I did anyway, you know pressure and all. Second, I've been reading straight YA, and it is really hard to transition into adult fiction when you are used to books going at breakneck speed.

The beginning of the book starts off with a main character who was not a real person in history. Her name is Miriam and she is Jewish. She's travelling across the Middle East with her parents when all of a sudden Crusaders come upon their caravan and kill her parents and then rape her. After that, we flash forward to about 10 years in the future. Saladin is in charge of Israel, and Richard the Lionheart has just been made king. Richard is not a big fan of Muslims and wants to reclaim the Holy Land. He also wants to cement his throne, since his brother John wants to be king too. (Also, guys, John really has a bad rap, but actually he just did the best he could, I mean COME ON, Richard drained the treasury, of course taxes had to be raised).

And so, of course, these characters interweave. Battles are had. As is love. And sexytimes. I'll admit, I liked the parts with Marian, she was pretty cool. Very headstrong, however she was constantly described as being hot with her milkshake bringing all the boys to the yard, which sort of got old after the 4th time. But, I did like her ingeniuity and the fact that she enjoyed reading in a time when not a whole lot of people were literate. Also, she was sexually liberated, in that she has sex for fun and her enjoyment. Again, I like that. As for historical accuracy, I am not too sure that is an accurate portrayal of women during this time. I mean, from my love sex and marriage in the middle ages class we learned people were all about chastity and if they were getting it on, it was with hookers, not with an upper class woman, like Miriam. But, it may have been different in Israel.

As for Saladin, he is so beyond cool. I mean, the man treats his war prisoners like guests instead of criminals. He is generous. He's got a great head for military. He is calm. He's also peaceful and tolerate of other religions. Now, of course the peaceful disappears when his land is attacked. I suppose that is when all bets are off. Either way, I did enjoy reading all that focused on him.

Finally, Richard. I found him to be an insufferable twit. He's so narrow-minded and cruel. I think this may have been on purpose. However, I could not wait for his parts to be over. I know history paints him as a hero, but really, I am not a fan. Personally, I like his father, Henry II best out of all the Angevins.

While I should have loved this book, I slightly liked it. Now, I don't think that is the book's fault, rather it is mine for reading it when I wasn't really feeling in the mood for it.
 
Gemarkeerd
booksandwine | 4 andere besprekingen | Sep 9, 2010 |
Don't judge this book by its cover. Beneath the cheesy painting on the cover lies an exciting story of the Third Crusade in the year 1192. Richard the Lionheart leads the armies of France to reclaim the Holy Lands from the sultan Saladin. The author's beautiful writing occasionally veers into purple prose, but I didn't mind-- it was all rather fun! This is the kind of book I love- one where I can learn a lot of history and get swept away to a faraway place and time.

Most interesting to me were the author's notes at the back. Kamran Pasha, a former Hollywood film and television screenwriter, relates how he was inspired to tell this story after 9/11. He felt the Crusades represent a sort of reversal of today's Christian/Muslim conflict:--"Like the Crusaders, the Muslim extremists are resorting to barbarism and brutality to fight a war they feel they cannot win any other way."

Pasha delivers a wonderful religious sensitivity throughout the novel. Lovers of history and epics will no doubt be captivated by this fine work.½
 
Gemarkeerd
GCPLreader | 4 andere besprekingen | Aug 1, 2010 |
Few will argue the old cliché that there are "two sides to every story," or that truth requires consideration of both sides, especially when it comes to the study of written history. The tendency of history textbooks to present only one point-of-view brings to mind the famous Winston Churchill quote, "History is written by the victors." But the "victors," unfortunately, tell us only what they want us to know, and the losers generally have lost their right to argue the point.

Kamran Pasha's "Shadow of the Swords" is an opportunity for Western readers to look at the bloody Third Crusade of the late twelfth century through the eyes of Saladin, commander of the Muslim forces in Palestine at the time of Richard the Lionheart's invasion of the region. Note, however, that portions of the book are written from Richard's point-of-view, although Saladin's character remains the most influential one throughout the book.

Most intriguingly, at the time of Richard's quest to recover the Holy Land from the hands of the Muslim "infidels," the relative strengths and weaknesses of the European and Muslim worlds were near opposites of what they are today. The twelfth century Muslim world was well ahead of its European counterpart in the areas of science, mathematics, medicine, government and weaponry. Despite this, Europeans generally considered Muslims to be little more than barbaric infidels with no right to occupy the Holy Land, especially the city of Jerusalem. As Saladin and his people saw it, Richard the Lionheart was the terrorist of his day, leader of an army seeking to destroy Muslim and Jew, alike, in the name of Christianity. More than 800 years later, the roles and positions of the two cultures have largely reversed.

Just three years before, Saladin had successfully rid Jerusalem of the Christian army that had controlled it for so long. Now, while Saladin continues to fight remnants of that army along the coast, Jerusalem is a peaceful city within which people of all faiths live and work in relative harmony. Saladin, a bit surprised at how quickly the Europeans have been able to place such a large army in Palestine to challenge him, realizes that he and his people are faced again with a war that might very well change the course of history. This fight, though, is as much about Saladin vs. Richard the Lionheart as it is about huge conflicting armies and religious differences.

Pasha uses a combination of historical and fictional characters to tell his story. And his fictional characters are so vividly painted, and his historical ones so well fleshed, that it can be difficult for the reader to remember which are real and which are made up. Pasha, very helpfully, explains which are which in an attachment to the end of the book that also puts much of the story into its historical context. "Shadow of the Swords" is eye-opening historical fiction cloaked in a love story involving Miriam, the niece of Saladin's Jewish advisor and doctor, Maimonides. Fate gives Miriam a chance to charm both leaders and she makes the most of her opportunity, eagerly playing the spy on Saladin's behalf. The inclusion of a fictional character like Miriam allows Pasha to create more complete personalities for Saladin and Richard so that there is a very personal aspect to their clash as the two men meet on the biggest world stage of their day.

Readers may find this one to be a little bit of a slow-starter (and some may, perhaps, even be a little put off at first by the point-of-view from which it is written). Do not, however, give up on this one too early; if you do, you are going to miss out on one heck of an adventure and a very painless history lesson.

Rated at: 5.0
1 stem
Gemarkeerd
SamSattler | 4 andere besprekingen | Jul 26, 2010 |
Aisha is one of those women that you have heard about often, but you rarely get a chance to learn about. Mr. Pasha has managed to tell a story that portrays a mischievous child, a young wife and a complex woman all in one.

If you are interested in learning more about the woman who was known as 'the most beloved' then this is definitely the book for you. If you want to understand more about the difference between Sunni and Shi'a Muslims, then this is not the book for you. If you want to see a different side of the Prophet (one that balances his life as a human, a man and a holy man) then this is the book for you.
 
Gemarkeerd
apamado | 10 andere besprekingen | Mar 15, 2010 |
I have to come clean and say I was a little reluctant about reading this book. I picked it up not really expecting to get that into it as I usually avoid books revolving around religions. So imagine my shock when I did not want to stop reading this book. My disclaimer is I know extremely little about Islam and cannot agree or disagree with how characters or beliefs were treated. That said I did get completely drawn into Aisha’s story and could not wait to finish the book.

I did find certain parts disturbing like the fact that Aisha was only 9 years old when she marries Muhammad. Somehow it just seemed wrong to have her sleeping with him on one page and then playing with her toy horses in another. I also don’t know if Pasha meant to portray Muhammad in this way but the way he went about collecting his wives just ticked me off. I mean I can’t judge, maybe he did really have these revelations that he should marry so and so but to me he just seemed to make excuses that would allow him to marry and lie with women that caught his eye. Not the sort of behavior I would expect from a messenger of God.

Both of these issues were outweighed by the intricate dances Muhammad had to dance in order to protect his followers and spread word of this new religion. If you really think about how hard it is for new religions to really god mainstream and then go on to become a dominant force within such a short period of time it is mind blowing. I think even readers who are not religious will enjoy this story.
 
Gemarkeerd
dasuzuki | 10 andere besprekingen | Jun 2, 2009 |
I was very excited to get a chance to read Mother of the Believers: A Novel of the Birth of Islam, the first book by screenwriter Kamran Pasha. When I read Salman Rushdie's The Satanic Verses last year, I became familiar with many of the names associated with the founding of Islam but the stories were exaggerated and twisted so I didn't get a good sense of the true history. Mother of the Believers is a novel and thus is partially fictionalized but it is based in the oral histories passed down through generations of Muslims and the history and characters are factual.

"Mother of the Believers" was the honorific title given to any of the wives of the prophet Muhammad. This narrative is the history and confession of the most beloved of the Mothers, Aisha. She married the prophet when she was only nine years old and she was his third wife. He ended up with many wives as he kept marrying widows that needed protection or women that were politically significant to the growth of the fledgling religion. Much of Aisha's story deals with her feelings while being a child bride and the mistakes that she makes in her life based on her youthful temper and her teenage jealousies. She was extremely beautiful but also somewhat impulsive and her outbursts would sometimes get her in trouble or embarrass Muhammad or the other Mothers.

Regardless of these things, I think that most readers will fall in love with Aisha the way that her father and mother, her sister, her husband and many more did. I normally don't recommend books because I think that tastes are highly subjective and individual but I think this book is a must read for people of all faiths and those of little or no faith. In our world today, Islam is so often misunderstood that it would be very productive for more people to familiarize themselves with its origins and its core beliefs. And while you would send someone to the New Testament to gain an understanding of Christianity, I have found the Qur'an to be a difficult entry point to Islam. This writing in this novel is very fluid and engaging and the reader will be familiar with the origins of Islam with little effort. If you would like to read the Qur'an or any biographies of Muhammad, the author also generously provides a list of sources as an Author's Note in the book.

http://webereading.com/2009/04/early-review-mother-of-believers.html½
 
Gemarkeerd
klpm | 10 andere besprekingen | Apr 14, 2009 |
As the subtitle suggests, Mother of the Believers is less a novel about Aisha, the Prophet Muhammad's favorite wife, than about the early years of Islam, as witnessed by Aisha. The author, a practicing Muslim, tells the story in the form of a memoir narrated by Aisha as an elderly woman nearing death, so even though most of the novel covers Aisha's life as a child and teenager (Muhammad died when she was only nineteen), the perspective is a mature woman's. One of the big differences between Christianity and Islam is that Christians worship Jesus as the divine son of God, while Muslims believe Muhammad was fully human and not divine. I found it interesting to read about a revered religious figure who sometimes made mistakes.

This is a completely different style of novel than the controversial Jewel of Medina, also about Aisha. Readers disappointed by the tone of that novel may find this one more to their taste - though it may still stir up controversy.

More at www.HistoricalNovels.info.
 
Gemarkeerd
margad | 10 andere besprekingen | Apr 14, 2009 |
Toon 17 van 17