Afbeelding auteur
12+ Werken 136 Leden 4 Besprekingen

Over de Auteur

Paul Routledge is Professor of Contentious Politics and Social Change at the School of Geography, University of Leeds and author of Terrains of Resistance and co-author of Global Justice Networks.

Werken van Paul Routledge

Gerelateerde werken

Slightly Foxed 25: A Date with Iris (2010) — Medewerker — 32 exemplaren
Slightly Foxed 16: For Pheasant Read Peasant (2007) — Medewerker — 27 exemplaren

Tagged

Algemene kennis

Geslacht
male

Leden

Besprekingen

A light, easily-digestible biography of the first woman to be appointed Speaker of the UK House of Commons.

A nice introduction sets the scene for a chronological journey through the life of Betty Boothroyd, from her birth and childhood in the old West Riding of Yorkshire, via secretarial and research jobs in Yorkshire and London and failed attempts at selection as an MP in Leicester and Peterborough, a spell in America working for Kennedy's election team, further failed selections in Nelson and Rossendale, a period of work in Strasbourg and, finally, successful election to the House of Commons, at the fifth attempt, as the Member of Parliament for West Bromwich in 1973.

The narrative continues with Betty's election as Speaker in April 1992, with insights into the political machinations of the House, to her retirement nearly 8 years later.

Odd patches in the book are a bit overcooked for my taste (e.g. the long, drawn-out discussion about whether Betty was, or was not, a "Tiller girl", and the over-heavy trudge through Labour's internecine warfare of the 1970's and 1980's), but despite these occasional dips into excessive detail, the book remains overall a pleasant, relaxing read.
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
SunnyJim | Mar 1, 2016 |
I stumbled across this book while doing some research on Colditz, the supposedly escape-proof castle/prison where incorrigible escapees were housed by the Nazis. I had never heard of Neave but reading just a couple of pages hooked me completely. It’s fascinating.

As a child Neave had been sent to Germany in 1933 to learn the language. This gave him an opportunity to witness fascism in practice and he formed a lifelong hatred of authoritarianism that became an obsession.

Unlike his fellow students who wanted nothing to do with war, Neave joined the Territorials. When the war began, he was shipped off to France as part of a Searchlight unit which was unfortunate enough to be assigned to defend Calais against Guderian’s panzers. He was shot by a sniper and captured. (He described these events in his book The Flames of Calais.**) He was captured and imprisoned in several different POW camps from which he tried to escape each time. Eventually, he wound up in Colditz, the supposedly escape-proof camp (that’s a laugh). He escaped to Switzerland in 1942 where he came to the attention of MI9, one of those shadowy numbered agencies of British Intelligence which, in this case, was “a wholly owned subsidiary of MI6.”

During the war, following his escape, he worked for MI9 in establishing and maintaining the escape routes for downed airmen. Anxious to get France following the Normandy invasions, he pushed through on the heels of the American Third Army in order to personally liberate one of the rather spectacular camps they had established right under the noses of the Germans. It held over 100 men and was supplied by air. One interesting and confirmed story has him preventing the destruction of Chartres Cathedral by American troops with orders to blow it up for fear snipers might be hiding in the towers. If so he personally saved one of the great Gothic cathedrals.

There is a relatively short chapter on Neave’s role in the Nuremberg trials. I was disappointed in its brevity for Neave’s -- he was one of the junior prosecutors -- comments on the reactions of each of the major defendants as the indictments were being read to them I thought were fascinating and would have enjoyed learning more. I realize in a biography one has to be selective, but I would have traded some of the escape detail for more depth about Nuremberg. Especially since the author questions whether Neave took its lessons to heart: “...soldiers should also understand politics, and Nuremberg was the greatest example of civil society seeking to make soldiers understand the nature of their actions and their responsibility to recognise political right and wrong. In his own life, the soldier – politician Neave was not always so scrupulous. He vigorously propounded the virtues of liberty and democracy but flirted dangerously with quasi-military groups in Britain determined to halt what they saw as a drift towards Communism. For the most part, the politician was in charge, but sometimes the soldier took over, as in his attitude to Northern Ireland much later."

He then morphed into politics, but his heart always lay with the secret service and he intertwined the two. Following a heart attack in 1959 (most likely caused by his excessive drinking and smoking, he resigned his ministerial offices and relegated to the back benches where he began to nurse a resentment against what he considered ill treatment from his conservative brethren taking a job as a lucrative parliamentary consultant for an atomic energy company. Back as an MP, his efforts were unspectacular except in the area of compensation for British POWS who had been held by the Germans in concentration camps. He was active in debates on the ‘brain drain’, care of the elderly, nuclear energy, toll bridges and the foot and mouth epidemic among English cattle. Making a long story shorter, Naeve offered his services to Margaret Thatcher as her campaign manager and using the psychological skills of the secret service, performed brilliantly. His intelligence network was “unsurpassed.”

By the early seventies, IRA violence was dominating the news. Following Thatcher’s election, Naeve could have virtually any position in her cabinet. Perhaps because of his MI6 experience he chose Northern Ireland. “Despite his reputation as a vaguely progressive Conservative, Neave was now moving in very deep shadows on the hard right of British – and Irish – politics.” No doubt he thought he could use force to quell the Republican movement. "Roger Bolton, a television producer who knew him and put together a documentary on his assassination, argues the paradox that Neave was a moral man willing to do things that immoral people were not: ‘If necessary, he took the gun out and there were difficult things to be done but for the most honourable of reasons.’ Thatcher perhaps owed him a great deal as Neave was the mastermind behind the coup that “dethroned” Edward Heath. using the “psy-ops” techniques he had acquired during his years in the intelligence services.

Neave was killed by a bomb in his car in 1979. Routledge managed to interview the team (another one of the hopelessly confusing quasi-independent groups with its own acronym (INLA) they were black-hooded and still very secretive, but hoped that by revealing the truth of Neave’s killing, they might persuade the British government to reveal information about some of the government’s own killings.

"He was a public servant who never really stopped being a secret agent.”

A riveting book. One caveat: some knowledge of 20th century British parliamentary history would be invaluable, something I did not have, and without it the central section seemed often ungrounded, but the recounting of his time during the war, his shadowy operations to get Thatcher elected and Northern Ireland make up for that. Highly recommended.

** In his book, Neave makes the case that holding Calais “at all costs” made the evacuation at Dunkirk possible. Liddell-Hart thought that was rubbish noting that the panzer division assigned to Calais was only one of seven and had been deployed because “it had nothing else to do,” and that the brave stand against overwhelming odds was a useless sacrifice that Churchill later glorified to salve his conscience.
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
ecw0647 | Oct 2, 2015 |
Recently, I read Routledge's biography of Gordon Brown. I thought that an excellent book and, by the end, felt that I knew Brown better than when I started. I wish that I could say the same about this tome.

The title,'Mandy', gives one a fair idea as to Routledge's feelings toward his subject (Mandelson hates this diminutive): to be fair, Routledge admits his views in the forward. This is really not sufficient excuse for a book which throws every unpleasant rumour at its subject. In one chapter, we are told that Mandelson was a member of the Young Communists and may be a spy, recruited whilst on a jaunt to Chile: not ten pages further and Mandelson has been recruited by the American far right!

The only area where the author sympathises with PM comes when the News of the World exposes Mandelson's sexual preferences. I got the feeling that the only reason for that was that Routledge knew that a 'gay bashing rant' would be bad for sales.

The ironic thing about a book such as this, is that when someone is attacked remorselessly like this, one naturally feels drawn towards them. I know Mandelson not a jot better for this work, but I am more sympathetic towards him!
… (meer)
 
Gemarkeerd
the.ken.petersen | May 17, 2010 |
This is an excellent book about the politician Gordon Brown. Were everyone within the UK to read it, I am confident that Labour would be returned with a landslide majority. The man who emerges from the pages of this book is intelligent, witty, has a clear moral compass and knows how to get this country to where it should be.

I have given the book a half star deduction for the limited amount of non-political information about Gordon's life. His ecclesiastic father gets little more mention than that: his Christian outlook influenced Gordon's views. I would have liked to know more about mum, dad and his siblings. The more one can see of a person's life away from whatever has made them famous, the more one can understand them.

Having made this criticism, this is still an excellent book. When Mr Routledge takes us behind the public façade of the relationship between Brown and Blair, the stories sound authoritative and have the ring of truth: we mere plebs will never know for certain, but the author's non-sensationalist approach convinces me that this is probably as close as we will get to an understanding.

A MUST read for every Britain and anyone interested in British politics or the modernisation of left wing politics.
… (meer)
½
 
Gemarkeerd
the.ken.petersen | Apr 23, 2010 |

Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk

Gerelateerde auteurs

Statistieken

Werken
12
Ook door
2
Leden
136
Populariteit
#149,926
Waardering
½ 3.7
Besprekingen
4
ISBNs
30

Tabellen & Grafieken