Afbeelding van de auteur.

Dominique Venner (1935–2013)

Auteur van The Shock of History

61 Werken 162 Leden 3 Besprekingen

Over de Auteur

Fotografie: Wikimedia Commons

Werken van Dominique Venner

The Shock of History (2015) 16 exemplaren
Frontier Pistols and Revolvers (1997) 13 exemplaren
Histoire de la collaboration (2000) 7 exemplaren
For a Positive Critique (2017) 6 exemplaren
Le siècle de 1914 (2006) 6 exemplaren
Le blanc soleil des vaincus (2015) 5 exemplaren
Was ist Nationalismus? (2019) 3 exemplaren
Histoire de l'Armée rouge (1981) 2 exemplaren
Le Coeur rebelle (1994) 2 exemplaren
Le Livre des armes (1972) 2 exemplaren
LE CHOC DE L'HISTOIRE (2011) 1 exemplaar
Ernst Junger (2012) 1 exemplaar
L'arme de chasse aujourd'hui (1990) 1 exemplaar
Le Mauser 96 (1982) 1 exemplaar
Les armes à feu françaises (1979) 1 exemplaar
Monsieur Colt 1 exemplaar
Gettysburg (1995) 1 exemplaar
Povijest terorizma 1 exemplaar
Goering 1 exemplaar

Tagged

Algemene kennis

Geboortedatum
1935-04-16
Overlijdensdatum
2013-05-21
Geslacht
male
Nationaliteit
France
Geboorteplaats
Paris, France
Plaats van overlijden
Notre Dame, Paris, France (suicide)
Opleiding
Military Academy, Rouffach
Beroepen
military historian
Polemicist

Leden

Besprekingen

E' la storia dei "Corpi Franchi" nella Germania del primo dopoguerra. Sono i soldati che non accettano la sconfitta e che in reparti di volontari, difendono la Patria Tedesca minacciata all'interno e all'esterno dal bolscevismo dilagante.
 
Gemarkeerd
BiblioLorenzoLodi | Nov 19, 2014 |
Un excellent livre sur un conflit très méconnu, la guerre civile russe. Dominique Venner est un historien marqué à droite, mais on ne ressent guère de parti pris dans son ouvrage.
 
Gemarkeerd
Tietie007 | Jan 22, 2012 |
A Predator in the Jungle: Colonel Kurtz in Makassar

Martin van Creveld, the military historian, stated that there are two strategies to win against a guerrilla force. The first strategy is to go for the hearts and minds of the local population, and to accept relatively heavy casualties among the regular army’s troops. The British did so against the IRA in Northern Ireland. In this media age it is the only possible approach for civilised nations. The second strategy is to openly use overwhelming force and accept innocent victims. Mr. Van Creveld gave the Syrian Baath-regime’s conquest of Hama as an example, where somewhere between 10,000 and 30,000 civilans were indiscriminately killed. Mr. Van Creveld could also have pointed at his former compatriot Raymond Westerling.

Captain Raymond Westerling was one of the few Dutchmen that have an opera based upon their lives. This book is his (auto-)biography, written originally in French by the right-wing historian and veteran of the Algerian War Dominique Venner. I have not seen the original edition, but doubt if it contains all the newspaper clippings and other documents that Westerling used to state his case to his compatriots. The book is written in the third person, and contains lots of dialogues that were never recorded ad verbatim. It breathes the hard-boiled romance of soldiery, and possibly reflects the novels Westerling read as a child. Westerling’s own hand seems to be more visible the more the book progresses through time, and as his role becomes more controversial. Venner clearly adored his subject, comparing him to Lawrence of Arabia, who also played a historic role on the fringe of a central conflict (like the Arab dessert vs. the Somme), and who wanted to be one with the native people in the country where he fought.

The book follows Westerling’s life as a soldier until the 1950’s. Westerling was born in Istanbul to a third-generation Dutch immigrant and his Greek wife. He spoke French, Greek, and Turkish, but hardly any Dutch. Westerling volunteered at the Dutch consulate in 1941 when he was 22 years old. He was then sent to Britain for training. Here he followed the British army’s commando training, including toughness training, unarmed combat, and silent killing. Westerling also worked as an instructor to new recruits in these fields. He also worked for the British counter espionage special branche. Westerling later got his baptism of fire on the Western front, and was wounded in a German rocket attack on Dutch soil.

On the 11th of September 1945, lieutenant Westerling was dropped by parachute near Medan on the Indonesian island of Sumatra. The Japanese have then surrendered some 3.5 weeks earlier, but are still mostly in charge. All Dutch citizens in the colony had been interned in concentration camps for years, where they found some uncomfortable protection from marauding local gangs, that claimed to fight for independence, but were often just bandits. The Japanese were still mostly in charge, and would remain so for months in various areas of the archipelago. There were also some contingents of British troops, mainly consisting of soldiers from British India. The British played a fishy role in the liberation of the Dutch East Indies, demanding Dutch ships and troops to help with the liberation of British territories, but not offering many reciprocal services to the Dutch.

Besides Westerling, there were just two other Dutch military in Medan, and they were all under control of the British. With the help of local Dutch Eurasians and native Indonesians sympathetic to the colonial regime, the young lieutenant slowly managed to increase the area under Dutch control, and thus managed to normalise life for the city’s citizens. He liberated more Dutchmen from camps near Medan, enabling him to increase the Dutch presence. The British found that Westerling had broadly the same ideas about the country as the nationalists. The Turk, as his nickname was, hardly had a flag to fight for, “all he could do was following his instinct and consciousness”. In Medan Westerling aimed at the hearts and minds of the citizenry, and although thugs put a price on his head, he received little resistance. Westerling also set his first steps in intelligence, setting up an information network, and attacking the enemy with disinformation. The book describes how he used his commando training to kill a gang of bandits with just the aid from a few locals that were either pro-Dutch or pro-independence. On several occasions Indonesians saved his life, and Westerling picked up a profound love for the country. In an appraisal of his time in Medan, the local pro-Dutch sultan stated that Westerling operated “somewhat drastically”, but that this was appropriate given the chaotic situation.

After his time in Sumatra, Westerling moved to Batavia, where he was promoted to captain, and asked set up a special forces unit, with native soldiers from the colonial army and Dutch volunteers. The training was tough, very tough, and aimed at complete control over fears. His troops had to be able to operate in small groups or even individually. “The jungle and the night are your best friends.” Ethics were not on the programme, at least not beyond respect for civilians, nationalists, and absolute obedience to Westerling. And the unit’s aim was not victory against the nationalists, but rather the protection of the Indonesian people.

Westerling and his troops were quickly dispatched to Makassar, the capital of the island of Celebes, and now called Ujung Pandang. At the time it wa a serious trouble spot. Local bandits and nationalist thugs had infiltrated the local police and intimidated the local people. As a consequence, social life and the economy were paralysed. Westerling defined his own solution, and got it accepted by his commanding officer. According to Westerling there was no normal military solution for a guerrilla attack from a village. If you used the normal military means, you shoot both at your opponents and at the villagers, creating a common interest between guerrillas and villagers. It was much better to get the villagers deliver you the guerrillas. This could be accomplished through consequent aiming your actions to the people. In the case of Celebes, summary execution of the criminals would, in the Eastern way, return the people’s trust in the government and lead to self defence.

And this is what he did. Westerling first sent out reconnaissance men to identify the criminal elements in a village. Then he would march in with his troops, round up the people, and separate the men from the women. The “criminals” on his list would be brought forward, and executed in front of the men. In other cases he would ask the villagers in a “court martial” who the “criminals” were, and execute them. He would then ask the imam for the village’s oath of allegiance. Westerling advocated that from his experience (in a country were he had just spent 1.5 year), the Indonesian farmers had a highly developed sense of justice that would work just fine to separate the criminal elements from the compromised. Written proof was not required. Westerling followed up with financial support.

He was highly successful. After 3 months normalcy was restored. In the mean time Westerling ruled like a god over life and death. He was not proud of his successes, but “moved like a predator in the jungle”. He personally shot a spy in the Sociëteit, a club for local businessmen, and when he felt his troops performed their role as executioners with too much enthusiasm, he took over that role. This way he Westerling took full responsibility for his actions, but also answered “to the deeply rooted sense of the Indonesian people that the enforcer of justice and the executioner are one and the same face”: “This people have become mine through election.” Westerling claimed that what he did was not counter terrorism in the sense of Van Creveld, as he aimed precisely at the criminal elements.

Again, Westerling was acquitted by his superiors. He himself stated some 800 people died because of his actions. Nationalist propaganda still mentions 40,000, but that is certainly exaggerated. Newer estimates stop at a few thousand, including those killed by local militias. Opposition against his action came up almost instantly and remained until Westerling’s death in the 1980’s. Political leadership always supported him half-heartedly, as in the end they would be held responsible.

The book also dedicates chapters to the conquest of nationalist capital Yogyakarta by the Special Forces troops not under Westerling’s command, and his poorly executed coup attempt in Bandung in 1950. Here again, Westerling thought that he was the man to protect the Indonesian people against “Javanese” oppression.

As far as I could check the facts in this book are mostly correct, but the interpretation leaves plenty of room for discussion. Reading this book often reminded me of Coppola’s flawed epos Apocalypse Now, with Westerling as another Colonel Kurtz. Willard, the man sent to assassinate Kurtz recognizes this hypocrisy by stating that his mission to assassinate Kurtz as a murderer “. . . in this place [Vietnam] was like handing out speeding tickets at the Indy 500.” Earlier on in the movie, General Corman states that "in this war, things get confused out there, power, ideals, the old morality, and practical military necessity. Out there with these natives it must be a temptation to be god. Because there's a conflict in every human heart between the rational and the irrational, between good and evil. The good does not always triumph. Sometimes the dark side overcomes what Lincoln called the better angels of our nature. Every man has got a breaking point. You and I have. Walter Kurtz has reached his. And very obviously, he has gone insane." I don’t think Westerling was insane. Kurtz’ monologue at the end of the movie comes closer: “you have no right to call me a murderer. You have no right to call me a murderer. You have a right to kill me. You have a right to do that, but you have no right to judge me. It's impossible for words to describe what is necessary to those who do not know what horror means. Horror. Horror has a face, and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and mortal terror are your friends. If they are not, then they are enemies to be feared. They are truly enemies.”

Westerling was a courageous and charismatic man, operating in extreme circumstances. He was a special forces soldier, solving a problem with the means of his profession. In the late 1940’s, ethics were left much more to the individual than now, and Westerling followed his instincts. He had been extremely successful for some time, and received support from the people he protected and his superiors. His modus operandi in South Celebes was not supported by law, but in the circumstances nobody saw an alternative solution for a situation that had clearly gone out of hand. In Makassar, his leadership was unchecked by any authority, although they could have done so if they had wanted to. I would not say that Westerling was a victim of circumstances, which he would likely not have accepted anyway. But his actions seem the product of the time and circumstances as much as of his own character.

And Westerling was also a romantic susceptible to hubris, and not corrected by his surroundings. His tombstone in Amsterdam reads “rakyat memberi beliau gelar ratu adil”, which means as much as “the people gave you the name ratu adil”. Ratu Adil is the name of a Javanese king, who, coming from the Middle East, will one day rule Java and create justice and prosperity. This he clearly never accomplished.

In Indonesia, Westerling’s heritage lives on. When you visit Indonesia as a Dutchman, his name is sometimes mentioned, and always in a negative way. After independence, the maverick Indonesian general Nasution tried to recruit as many of Westerling’s troops as he could. Himself a theoretician of guerrilla and counter guerrilla warfare, Nasution thought they were the best soldiers he had ever seen. Some of Westerling’s troops joined the Moluccan rebellion in 1950. They outgunned the Indonesian national army, who asked another Dutchman that had settled in the country to set up their own special forces unit, Kopassus. In 2008, Discovery TV elected Kopassus as one of the three best special forces units in the world, after the SAS and the Mossad. Wearing the same red berets as Westerling, Kopassus excels in counter guerrilla, camouflage, strategy, and general toughness. They have also committed serious war crimes in East Timor in the 1990’s.
… (meer)
½
 
Gemarkeerd
mercure | Aug 1, 2010 |

Prijzen

Misschien vindt je deze ook leuk

Statistieken

Werken
61
Leden
162
Populariteit
#130,374
Waardering
3.8
Besprekingen
3
ISBNs
56
Talen
6

Tabellen & Grafieken