Tova Andrea Wang

Wang gives us both a history of voter suppression tactics in the USA since the end of Reconstruction, and a strong case for the illegitimacy of voter suppression as a means of partisan competition.

Some will remember at least some key facts about the use of poll taxes and literacy tests to prevent African-Americans from voting in the post-Reconstruction era. Even those readers may be startled at the extent of the suppression and the strength of its effects, as well as parallel efforts in northern states to limit the votes of "undesirables" there. Wang follows the evolution in both tactics and in who was interested in suppressing whom.

This is not a partisan book; it is, in fact, a rather dry academic study in most respects. Some will interpret it as partisan, unfortunately, because at the present time, one party is far more interested than the other party in gaining advantage by suppressing the votes of those who are likely to vote against them. At the present time, the other party has been far more interested in gaining advantage by bringing non-voting citizens into the process.

As Wang makes clear, the difference between these two approaches is not trivial. One approach damages the democratic project; the other, even when pursued for partisan advantage, strengthens it. This is a timely and important read, and I strongly recommend it.

I received a free electronic galley of this book from the publisher via NetGalley.… (meer)

On one hand this was a really depressing history of voter suppression in the United States; on the other, there is a lot of hope here as well. Wang makes it abundantly clear that all parties have had a hand in shrinking the voting pool throughout this country's history, so this is not aimed at any one party in particular (though it is clear which party is leading that charge right now). Also, she includes steps that anyone can take to reverse that trend, and why it is in BOTH party's interests to do so. Definitely recommended reading.… (meer)