Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... On the People's Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracydoor Philip Pettit
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)Prijzen
According to republican theory, we are free persons to the extent that we are protected and secured in the same fundamental choices, on the same public basis, as one another. But there is no public protection or security without a coercive state. Does this mean that any freedom we enjoy is a superficial good that presupposes a deeper, political form of subjection? Philip Pettit addresses this crucial question in On the People's Terms. He argues that state coercion will not involve individual subjection or domination insofar as we enjoy an equally shared form of control over those in power. This claim may seem utopian but it is supported by a realistic model of the institutions that might establish such democratic control. Beginning with a fresh articulation of republican ideas, Pettit develops a highly original account of the rationale of democracy, breathing new life into democratic theory. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)321.8Social sciences Political Science Political Systems RepublicLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Chapter 3 on political legitimacy in democracy is probably the best discussion on this subject that I've come across. Chapter 5, which discusses ideas of democratic control from Schumpeter to the author's own, partly market-inspired model, is also highly original and interesting. Chapter 2 on social justice was much less inspiring, but this is probably due to my own predilections, not the text itself.
I also liked the author's concise step-by-step summary of the entire argument at the end of the book. All in all this is great work and probably unique in the way it unifies the traditional ethical perspective of political philosophy with more descriptive and pragmatic ones from democratic theory. It asks a lot from its readers but also richly rewards focused students by opening up new vistas across many different subfields in political thought. It goes without saying that I highly recommend it.