Three stars for how repetitive Joyce could get, especially when she was trying to make certain points; and how poorly sentences and paragraphs were sometimes structured. There were multiple times I had to go back and reread a few of them to figure out what was going on. Five stars for content and research. I'd tried to read this book multiple times before finally getting through it tonight. It's a dense, fact-packed read that also examines multiple other cultures across the globe. It's emotionally difficult and utterly infuriating. It's absolutely still going, and worsening. I liked how Joyce laid out things so bluntly and was so matter-of-fact. I'm so glad I was able to read it all the way through. Highly recommended for all. ( )

Do you remember that quip people give to people who are against abortion? You know, the one about how more pro-life people should be adopting. This book explains why that joke is funny, but only when it isn't taken to heart. As usual for a nonfiction title I'm reviewing, it isn't a comfortable book, but it is a good book. My reactions to it are strong. That might be because I'm a woman and have been a single mother, but this book often made my blood boil against people using women in less advantaged positions to meet the demands for children acceptable to the adoption market. ( )

This has given me lots to think about. ( )

A well-researched and thoughtful look at the unintended outcomes that arise when well-meaning people from wealthy countries seek to adopt a child from a developing country. Over and over again Joyce comes back to this question: "Why aren't we helping the mothers?" Joyce cites historical statistics that indicate that, when given a choice, and when given support, women will choose to keep and raise their own children 8 out of 10 times, an outcome that seems to cross every cultural and national border. On the other hand, if the only support being offered is the message: "we will take your baby and give it to a good home," then the reverse is true. Throughout the book Joyce urges readers to think for themselves about the greater ramifications of adoption, and in particular, of international adoption. Joyce chronicles one country after another where an influx of money from well-meaning parents-to-be has led to corruption and child trafficking, and where unqualified adoption agencies descend on one country after another in search of the easiest adoptions and the least red tape, which in turn leads to poor placement decisions, abuse, and more corruption. The book challenged my preconceptions on many levels. I recommend it highly. ( )

Another insightful investigation into a little-known facet of American evangelical Christianity from Kathryn Joyce, the author of the seminal work on the quiverfull movement. Joyce investigates the phenomenon of evangelical Christianity's involvement in the adoption industry and the effects their crusade to save the world's children through religious adoption have had on children, families, and governments from Ukraine to Ethiopia. The book also traces the human rights abuses that have plagued adoption for decades, from American women forced into unwed mothers' homes in the 1950s to child trafficking in Africa. This book is impeccably researched and clearly draws on academic work, but it is written in a clear, comprehensible fashion that doesn't bog the lay-reader down in terminology.

The book has been controversial for failing to laud everything about the adoption movement and pointing out the negative externalities it has created; some people have been taken aback by Joyce's use of economics -- namely, the phrase "supply and demand" -- to describe the adoption market. Yet the description is apt. For so many of these crooked adoption agencies, it is a market, with children stolen, parents lied to, visa applications forged, just to meet the West's huge demand for children to adopt.

I was unfamiliar with many of the stories presented in the book, including the Baby Scoop Era and the huge South Korean adoption market caused by their extremely socially conservative views on sex. For me, this book was an eye-opener. I appreciated that Joyce occasionally (certainly not overwhelming at all) tied these issues to the lack of agency given to women and the poor both in foreign countries and in America. Unfortunately, it is all too easy to exploit people with no knowledge of the law or their own rights.

If you liked [Quiverfull], you'll probably like this book as well. I certainly did. ( )