Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... The Double Life of Paul De Mandoor Evelyn Barish
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderscheidingen
Describes the life of the Yale University professor behind the deconstruction movement, who at the time of his death was one of the most influential literary critics in America but was later revealed to be a Nazi collaborator and anti-Semite. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)801.95092Literature By Topic Literary Theory Literary theory and criticism Biography And History BiographyLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
From there the story told is one of De Man's cobbling together his persona of the austere & inscrutable thinker, largely when at the end of available options and having no place left to fly. One can only speculate then on the worth of theories coming from an individual who seems to have betrayed just about every personal and professional confidence in their life before that point. About the only thing that explains (if not excuses) this series of dubious adventures is the whiff of mental illness that hung over De Man's family. I respond to all this rather strongly in as much as there used to be someone very important in my life who also seems on the verge of losing a glittering career and desirable life due to mental illness; while I regard this as a tragedy I also care more about the people who they have hurt.
As for whether there is anything to be salvaged from the academic contributions of De Man, while Barish is reluctant to give the man any benefit of the doubt she suggests in her epilog that his skepticism about language and meaning was liberating to a generation desiring racial and gender liberation and who were seeking weapons against cant and prejudice. The difference is that these people fighting for the recognition of their humanity redeemed De Man's thought through a conviction and commitment that De Man displayed little of in the first half of his adult life; one suspects that Barish finds this to be insufficient recompense for what were at least major systemic errors in judgement.
The one thing that gives me some pause is, as has been suggested elsewhere, that the author seems to have a major issue with De Man (they were colleagues at one point), as if being angry over having been taken in by the man's undoubted charisma. I could have also passed on some of the neo-Freudian imagery Barish deploys at some points in the book. ( )