Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty (1980)door Morris Kline
Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. 7/6/22 In spite of a fascinating subject--the way the once-monolithic field of Mathematics has splintered over the past two centuries into competing, contradictory factions--I had to give up on this book because of the poor writing. Any book that begins with the sentence "ANY CIVILIZATION WORTHY OF THE APPELLATION HAS SOUGHT TRUTHS" is already facing an extreme uphill battle with me (the ALL CAPS is there in the text. Really). It keeps going. Chapter 2 opens with " THE MAJESTIC GREEK CIVILIZATION WAS DESTROYED BY SEVERAL FORCES." Clearly Professor Kline would have benefitted from a few courses in Freshman Composition while teaching at NYU... this is the kind of classically bad writing you get from 17 year olds trying to say something important and not yet knowing how. Kline could have benefited from taking a few Humanities courses, too. The introduction is a hysteria of blather about how nothing is certain any longer--ok, to whom is this news? Have we not been thinking about this problem at least since Galileo published Starry Messenger? Did Morris Kline never read Hamlet? Ok, I feel slightly bad slamming the book of a deceased scholar who tried valiantly throughout his life to reform mathematics education. Maybe this is a book he knocked off when he was too busy in the real world to worry about his writing.
"[H]is descriptions suffer from his extreme position as applied mathematician. . . . Kline's zeal obscures his perspective." "Professor Kline does not deal honestly with his readers. He is a learned man and knows perfectly well that many mathematical ideas created in abstracto have found significant application in the real world. He chooses to ignore this fact, acknowledged by even the most fanatic opponents of mathematics. He does this to support an untenable dogma. One is reminded of the story of the court jester to Louis XIV: the latter had written a poem and asked the jester his opinion. 'Your majesty is capable of anything. Your majesty has set out to write doggerel and your majesty has succeeded.' On balance, such, alas, must be said of this book." "I think three quarters of it is superb, and the other quarter is outrageous nonsense . . ." "[T]he author's grasp of twentieth century logic is not reliable. . . . The philosophical confusions and the foundational inaccuracies are intimately related and are perhaps jointly explainable by reference to the author's misunderstanding of the complex of traditional philosophic distinctions which have been both exploited by and clarified by modern foundational work. . . . One can only regret the philosophical, foundational, and historical inadequacies which vitiate the main argument . . ." "[T]he book has disappointed me in two respects. (1) as to the contents and views, nothing much is new; (2) as to the style of presentation, it is too loose, too additive, and a little pretentious." Onderdeel van de uitgeversreeks(en)Studio [Mondadori] (118) PrijzenErelijsten
This work stresses the illogical manner in which mathematics has developed, the question of applied mathematics as against 'pure' mathematics, and the challenges to the consistency of mathematics' logical structure that have occurred in the twentieth century. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)510.9Natural sciences and mathematics Mathematics General Mathematics Biography And HistoryLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |