Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... For the Sake of Argument: Essays and Minority Reportsdoor Christopher Hitchens
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
'For the sake of argument, one must never let a euphemism or a false consolation pass uncontested. The truth seldom lies, but when it does lie it lies somewhere in between.'. The global turmoil of the last few years has severely tested every analyst and commentator. Few have written with such insight as Christopher Hitchens about the large events - or with such discernment and with about the small tell-tale signs of a disordered culture. For the Sake of Argument ranges from the political squalor of Washington, as a beleaguered Bush administration seeks desperately to stave off disaster and Clinton prepares for power, to the twilight of Stalinism in Prague; from the Jewish quarter of Damascus in the aftermath of the Gulf War to the embattled barrios of Central America and the imperishable resistance of Saralevo, as a difficult peace is negotiated with ruthless foes. Hitchens' unsparing account of Western realpolitik in the end shows it to rest on delusion as well as deception. The reader will find in these pages outstanding essays on political assassination in America as well as a scathing review of the evisceration of politics by pollsters and spin-doctors. Hitchens' knowledge of the tortuous history of revolutions in the twentieth century helps him to explain both the New York intelligentsia's flirtation with Trotskyism and the frailty of Communist power structures in Eastern Europe. Hitchens' pointed reassessments of Graham Greene, P.G. Wodehouse and C.L.R. James, or his riotous celebration of drinkiny and smoking, display an engaging enthusiasm and an acerbic wit. Equally entertaining is his unsparing rogues' gallery, which gives us unforgettable portraits of the lugubrious 'Dr'Kissinger, the comprehensively reactionary 'Mother' Teresa, the preposterous Paul Johnson and the predictable P.J. O'Rourke. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)814.54Literature English (North America) American essays 20th Century 1945-1999LC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
This may merely be a sequencing issue; the book starts with a selection – depressing but interesting – grouped under the title 'Studies in Demoralization', and ends with a lengthy discussion of George Eliot, author of Middlemarch. But it might also be due to my over-familiarity with Hitchens' work by now, with the views expressed here further sharpened and improved in subsequent writings and debates. It might also be because For the Sake of Argument, compiling essays from the "Reagan-Bush-Thatcher decade" (pg. 2) of the late 80s and early 90s, is inevitably dated when read in 2020.
That said, it can be peculiar to read about Diana Spencer being discussed in a way we might speak of Meghan Markle nowadays – one can also substitute Reagan for Trump, or Mr Clinton for, well, Mrs Clinton. In this collection, one can read articles arguing against political correctness, identity politics, poll-driven media and, among many other uncanny things, the "fashion, in American black studies these days, for running down the DWEM – the Dead White European Male who is held to dominate the study of literature and civilization" (pg. 308). Were it not for the talk of Reagan and Thatcher and Diana in the present tense – with Bush not needing the further identification of Bush 'Senior' – I'd be inclined to double-check the dates. There is an arch contemporariness in all of Hitchens' writing, because he is concerned above all with matters of principle. ( )