Bezig met laden...

The Social Atom: Why the Rich Get Richer, Cheaters Get Caught, and Your Neighbor Usually Looks Like You

door Mark Buchanan

Leden	Besprekingen	Populariteit	Gemiddelde beoordeling	Aanhalingen
159	8	173,298	(3.59)	3
The idiosyncrasies of human decision-making have confounded economists and social theorists for years. If each person makes choices for personal (and often irrational) reasons, how can people's choices be predicted by a single theory? How can any economic, social, or political theory be valid? The truth is, none of them really are. This book makes the fascinating argument that the science of physics is beginning to provide a new picture of the human or "social atom," and help us understand the surprising, and often predictable, patterns that emerge when they get together. Look at patterns, not people, the author argues, and rules emerge that can explain how movements form, how interest groups operate, and even why ethnic hatred persists. Using similar observations, social physicists can predict whether neighborhoods will integrate, whether stock markets will crash, and whether crime waves will continue or abate. Brimming with mind games and provocative experiments, the book is an incisive, accessible, and comprehensive argument for a whole new way to look at human social behavior.… (meer)

alle leden

▾Leden

Onlangs toegevoegd door

Moon_Cthulhu, dlopatto, raparin, InqCommoner, olga.p, colinlibthing, zetetic23, davidburch, MarkLacy, SanjivSharma

▾Trefwoorden

▾LibraryThing Aanbevelingen

▾Lijsten

Geen

▾Iets voor jou?

Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

▾Discussies (Over links)

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

» Zie ook 3 vermeldingen

▾Besprekingen door leden

datum ▼ | stemmen

1-5 van 8 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)

Disappointing. I think for one thing, Buchanan misused the metaphor of "social atom." For another, based on the premise of the book I would've expected a lot more discussion of physics and physics-like models. Seemed like much of what he discussed was not new to me either. (

)

MarkLacy | May 29, 2022 |

Che libro interessante! Finalmente un giusto equilibrio tra semplificazione e rigore. Un'ottima appendice con approfondimenti anche piuttosto tecnici, e argomenti di estrema attualità. L'idea principale dell'autore consiste nel fatto che la complessità sociale sia un fenomeno collettivo, emergente, e non costituito semplicemente dalla somma delle complessità dei singoli individui. Un "Must have" per chiunque si sia mai chiesto perché dopo aver fatto un'ora di coda in autostrada scopriamo poi che non c'era nessun incidente, oppure come sia possibile regolamentare i flussi di dieci, venti o anche centomila persone che si sono riunite tutte nello stesso luogo (ad esempio, per un concerto). E tante altre cose, dalla sociologia alla geologia all'antropologia. Che ci sia una speranza che, finalmente, le "scienze sociali" entrino in contatto con il metodo scientifico? (

)

Eva_Filoramo | May 3, 2018 |

An interesting read. Not my field of experteise but I can see how some of it would ring true. Like some other reviewers he lost me at the end when he started attacking religion. Surely it, like all other human traits should be worked with rather than against.

It's an interesting look at the fact that humanity tends to work in groups and that a lot of people find it very hard to go against the group. He's a physicist and has some pet theories about social sciences that he feels need airing.

It's one to read, think about and use some salt with. Peppered with interesting ideas and encouages thinking. (

)

wyvernfriend | Apr 22, 2009 |

I went to a seminar by the author recently, which is why I picked this one up. Unfortunately it's a little more pop-science than I was hoping for, and complexity science writers really need to come up with some new anecdotes, because there wasn't a whole lot to this book that I hadn't come across elsewhere.

This book is basically about how the social sciences should use a more physics-like, experimental approach to their research, instead of coming up with theorems which are logical but don't produce results that resemble reality. (I quite like the quote from Mike Davis on the back cover: "This is a first-class attack on the smugness of the Humanities".) The sections on economics and altruism were particularly lacking in things I hadn't heard before, but the stuff about ethnocentrism was pretty interesting.

Over all, I thought this was pretty good but could have done with more maths. (

)

tronella | Dec 22, 2008 |

The author says, "Get a rough picture of the social atom, and of how people interact, then use anything you have, mathematics, the computer, whatever, to learn the kinds pattern likely to emerge and what their consequences might be. Outside of the social world, this is how all science works. And it is ironic that this is still not the way most social science works." It's easier said than done. The problem is that pattern itself may not last forever. So just by discovering a pattern might not prove anything. It just takes one abnormal pattern to disprove the discovery. Also, the author portrays religion as a dangerous threat to human society. It's just as a narrow view point in my mind. What about pointing out how religion also contributed positively to our society in "some" ways"? (

)

lt999 | Nov 15, 2008 |

datum ▼ | stemmen

1-5 van 8 worden getoond (volgende | toon alle)

▾Gepubliceerde besprekingen

geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe

▾Andere auteurs

» Andere auteurs toevoegen (1 mogelijk)

▾Reeksen en verbanden tussen werken

▾Prijzen en onderscheidingen

geschiedenis tonen

▾Algemene kennis

Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.

Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .

Gangbare titel

Oorspronkelijke titel

Alternatieve titels

Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave

Mensen/Personages

Belangrijke plaatsen

Belangrijke gebeurtenissen

Verwante films

Motto

Opdracht

Eerste woorden

Citaten

Laatste woorden

Ontwarringsbericht

Uitgevers redacteuren

Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing

Oorspronkelijke taal

Gangbare DDC/MDS

Canonieke LCC

▾Verwijzingen

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

▾Boekbeschrijvingen

The idiosyncrasies of human decision-making have confounded economists and social theorists for years. If each person makes choices for personal (and often irrational) reasons, how can people's choices be predicted by a single theory? How can any economic, social, or political theory be valid? The truth is, none of them really are. This book makes the fascinating argument that the science of physics is beginning to provide a new picture of the human or "social atom," and help us understand the surprising, and often predictable, patterns that emerge when they get together. Look at patterns, not people, the author argues, and rules emerge that can explain how movements form, how interest groups operate, and even why ethnic hatred persists. Using similar observations, social physicists can predict whether neighborhoods will integrate, whether stock markets will crash, and whether crime waves will continue or abate. Brimming with mind games and provocative experiments, the book is an incisive, accessible, and comprehensive argument for a whole new way to look at human social behavior.

▾Beschrijvingen bibliotheek

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

▾Beschrijving door LibraryThing leden

Boekbeschrijving

Haiku samenvatting