He has some great ideas. Every American should be exposed to his ideas. It is clear that the constitution was meant to change as our country grew. ( )

While I don't agree with all of the proposals, this is definitely a worthwhile read to recognize/grapple with constitutional/structural issues that exist. ( )

Some interesting ideas, some less so. ( )

Mr. Sabato suggestions are an excellent starting point. That said I believe his suggestions applied in total will weaken the Federal form of government toward the problems of direct democracy. I do believe his suggestion to increase the membership of the House of Representatives is solid and if applied would go a long way toward enfranchising many of the disillusioned. Certainly smaller districts will produce candidates more familiar to the electorate and at the same time dilute the effect of lobbying. ( )

In his new book A More Perfect Constitution (Walker & Company, 2007) Larry Sabato, the founder and director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics lays out a series of twenty-three proposals for constitutional revision. These amendments would, he argues, bring the Constitution into the twenty-first century by making the structures of our government more fair, more representative, and more effective.

Most of us are instinctively leery of major structural changes to the Constitution, and with good reason - it's lasted for more than two centuries, and has served the United States well. At first glance, some if not many of Sabato's proposals seem unnecessary, unpalatable, or both. But after reading his justifications for them, I was convinced by both the desirability and the necessity of nearly all of them.

Since Sabato's stated purpose with his book is to promote a great debate over these ideas, and to prompt what he terms a "generational process of moderate, well-considered change," I've begun a discussion here of his proposals by outlining them in brief and adding my own views as they currently stand (I will admit that some of them changed just in the course of reading this book). I have attempted as much as possible to keep Sabato's proposals separate from my own opinions so as not to influence others' perceptions of his ideas, but I do encourage everyone interested in this discussion to read his book, where he makes his case in much greater and persuasive detail.

I don’t agree with all of Sabato’s proposals; I doubt anyone will. I certainly don’t expect everyone to agree with my views either. But I do think these points are all worth debating, and I agree with Sabato that we shouldn’t simply accept the Constitution as it stands, but should examine how it works and what, if anything, we can do to make it better for the nation. Some of the changes Sabato suggests would, I submit, make our government work better, and I applaud him for putting out this plan for us all to discuss and consider. Whether anything will come of it remains to be seen, but certainly nothing will happen if we just ignore the proposals.

http://philobiblos.blogspot.com/2007/10/book-review-more-perfect-constitution.ht... ( )