Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Womendoor Roberta Gilchrist
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Gender and Material Culture is the first complete study in the archaeology of gender, exploring the differences between the religious life of men and women. Gender in medieval monasticism influenced landscape contexts and strategies of economic management, the form and development of buildings and their symbolic and iconographic content. Women's religious experience was often poorly documented, but their archaeology indicates a shared tradition which was closely linked with, and valued by local communities. The distinctive patterns observed suggest that gender is essential to archaeological analysis. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)271.90041Religions History, geographic treatment, biography of Christianity Religious Congregations and Orders in Church history Orders of WomenLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
This is a solid work; the highlight for me was the first chapter, which outlines the development of gender theory in archaeology since the 1980s in astonishingly lucid prose (anything that can make Bourdieu clearer to me is deserving of the accolade 'astonishing'). There are some weaknesses, however. Structurally, it betrays its origins as a doctoral dissertation, and could have used some rearranging and judicious editing. For a book about women, the women themselves do not feature strongly—perhaps because there is so little detail on the activities which they performed. Apart from one brief and intriguing mention of nuns having possibly worked in the fields at harvest time in the fourteenth century, these women recede into the background. At times, too, Gilchrist seems to slip into using the male/female gender binary which she so adamantly rejects in her introduction. Still, this is a good demonstration of the fact that a gendered analysis of material culture is possible and highly informative. ( )