StartGroepenDiscussieMeerTijdgeest
Doorzoek de site
Onze site gebruikt cookies om diensten te leveren, prestaties te verbeteren, voor analyse en (indien je niet ingelogd bent) voor advertenties. Door LibraryThing te gebruiken erken je dat je onze Servicevoorwaarden en Privacybeleid gelezen en begrepen hebt. Je gebruik van de site en diensten is onderhevig aan dit beleid en deze voorwaarden.

Resultaten uit Google Boeken

Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.

Bezig met laden...

Reckoning with Risk: Learning to Live with Uncertainty (2002)

door Gerd Gigerenzer

LedenBesprekingenPopulariteitGemiddelde beoordelingDiscussies
1485185,226 (3.74)Geen
In the beginning of the 20th century, the father of modern science fiction, H.G. Wells, predicted that statistical thinking would be as necessary for citizenship in a technological world as the ability to read and write. Yet, a century on, most of us, from TV weather forecasters to the American President, seem to have no idea of how to reason about uncertainties.… (meer)
Bezig met laden...

Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden.

Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek.

Engels (4)  Italiaans (1)  Alle talen (5)
Toon 5 van 5
Lots of good points, but a bit laborious. All how best to convey clearly information about risk. How doctors usually don’t understand the first thing about probability and how to communicate risks, changes in risk and relative risks clearly, especially when Bayes rule is needed. Definitely for the specialist how isn’t a specialist in maths. ( )
  jvgravy | Sep 5, 2022 |
L'idea di base era ottima: riuscire a dimostrare anche a chi non ha studiato statistica che le probabilità assegnate ad alcuni eventi non sono affatto quelle che si pensa. Anche gli esempi sono scelti in maniera da interessare: vedere come al processo contro O.J. Simpson l'avvocato difensore è riuscito a girare le carte in tavola e convincere la giuria che la probabilità che il suo cliente fosse un assassino fosse molto più bassa della realtà; oppure calcolare come essere positivi a un test antiAIDS non significa poi molto se non si appartiene a un gruppo a rischio.Però Quando i numeri ingannano è stato almeno per me una delusione. Non so se è perché i concetti io almeno in teoria li conosco, oppure perché il libro è troppo ripetitivo e io mi annoio in fretta. Ma garantisco che lo stesso materiale io l'avrei condensato in duecento pagine. ( )
  .mau. | Nov 17, 2017 |
This book investigates how statistics may be misused by the medical and legal professions to mislead the public. It lists simple ways to cut through the statistical clap-trap and derive figures meaningful to the human brain. This would be an insightful read for educators and the public alike. ( )
  martensgirl | Jun 23, 2012 |
This book is highly recommended for anyone who has to use numbers to communicate information or who tries to interpret numeric information to make informed judgements.

The book has as its central theme the confusion caused, intentionally or otherwise when information is presented poorly. It presents a truly startling picture of the resulting innumeracy not just within the general public but also amongst trained professionals.

Though the lessons are generic, a significant portion of the book deals with examples drawn from the world of medicine. These are used to illustrate the very simple root causes by which information is presented in ways that obscure meaning and make reasoned judgement difficult if not impossible.

These medical examples are far from obscure and deal with issues that will be of concern to many of us, such as data on HIV AIDS, Breast Cancer Screening, Prostate Cancer and use of the contraceptive pill for example.

The thrust of the book is not that information does not exist to assist judgement of risks in these areas, but that the way it is presented and communicated serves to perpetuate innumeracy amongst patient and clinician alike. This innumeracy can have dramatic consequences with inappropriate treatments being selected and patients being caused undue worry, distress or physical harm. An example is cited of a surgeon who performed breast removal operations on 90 patients who showed no sign of disease, simply based on his interpretation of the risk they faced of contracting it in the future.

The examples are not limited solely to medicine and the legal profession comes in for its share of scrutiny including DNA fingerprinting and an insightful look at how innumeracy may have contributed to the outcome of the O.J. Simpson case.

The lessons for the broader business community are clear.
The book is divided in to three sections that don’t just provide examples of the problem of effectively communicating data but clear simple guidance on how it can be avoided.

By dealing with topic areas that many of us will recognise the book is able to clearly illuminate the problems of innumeracy and graphically illustrate the impact this can have with lessons for our personal and business lives. It may also provide particularly valuable insights for those who face the specific health problems it uses as examples and help create understanding of the real risks faced for example by a positive breast cancer screening result.

The book also has some absurd but real examples of innumeracy lunacy, for example the Mexican government which increased road volume by simply repainting a four lane highway with six lanes - a 50% increase. The high volume of accidents this caused led to the road being reduced back to 4 lanes - a 33% reduction and the later claim that road volume had actually been increased by 17%! It also has a section of fun examples of innumeracy to help drive the point home and a chapter on teaching clear thinking.

I highly recommend this book as an entertaining an illuminating read. It may help allay unnecessary fears for those facing personal medical problems and will certainly improve everyone’s ability to ask the right questions to get to the bottom of what data is really telling us. ( )
  Steve55 | Jan 18, 2009 |
Toon 5 van 5
geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Je moet ingelogd zijn om Algemene Kennis te mogen bewerken.
Voor meer hulp zie de helppagina Algemene Kennis .
Gangbare titel
Informatie afkomstig uit de Italiaanse Algemene Kennis. Bewerk om naar jouw taal over te brengen.
Oorspronkelijke titel
Alternatieve titels
Oorspronkelijk jaar van uitgave
Mensen/Personages
Belangrijke plaatsen
Belangrijke gebeurtenissen
Verwante films
Motto
Opdracht
Eerste woorden
Citaten
Laatste woorden
Ontwarringsbericht
Uitgevers redacteuren
Auteur van flaptekst/aanprijzing
Oorspronkelijke taal
Gangbare DDC/MDS
Canonieke LCC

Verwijzingen naar dit werk in externe bronnen.

Wikipedia in het Engels

Geen

In the beginning of the 20th century, the father of modern science fiction, H.G. Wells, predicted that statistical thinking would be as necessary for citizenship in a technological world as the ability to read and write. Yet, a century on, most of us, from TV weather forecasters to the American President, seem to have no idea of how to reason about uncertainties.

Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden.

Boekbeschrijving
Haiku samenvatting

Actuele discussies

Geen

Populaire omslagen

Snelkoppelingen

Waardering

Gemiddelde: (3.74)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 6
3.5 4
4 4
4.5 3
5 3

Ben jij dit?

Word een LibraryThing Auteur.

 

Over | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Privacy/Voorwaarden | Help/Veelgestelde vragen | Blog | Winkel | APIs | TinyCat | Nagelaten Bibliotheken | Vroege Recensenten | Algemene kennis | 205,246,251 boeken! | Bovenbalk: Altijd zichtbaar