![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/0942617460.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Whatever Happened to Justice? (An Uncle Eric Book)door Richard J. Maybury
![]() Geen Bezig met laden...
![]() Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. Once again, Uncle Eric explains clearly and concisely the fundamentals we have forgotten. He focuses this time on our system of justice, especially the abandonment of common and higher law. If more people understood these concepts, our world would improve. He addresses that there are some unresolved problems, and offers some direction toward solving them (example: capital punishment completely ignores the tradition of restitution). This book reminds us that democracy can easily become a tyranny of the majority. The French Revolution exemplifies this in horrific form. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Onderdeel van de reeks(en)
"Whatever Happened to Justice?" shows what's gone wrong with America's legal system and economy and how to fix it. It also contains lots of helpful hints for improving family relationships and for making families and classrooms run more smoothly. Discusses the difference between higher law and man-made law, and the connection between rational law and economic prosperity. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
![]() GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)340.11Social sciences Law Law Theory Particular TopicsLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:![]()
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
Though, ashamed as I am to say that I learned quite a bit of this book as it is written for grade school children, I also have to point out that this book didn't sit quite right with me. Highly opinionated, the author claims that government isn't as good as it is made out to be and he even goes so far as to propose that we would be better off with no government at all. As the beginning of this work claims that it intends to debunk myths about government, I feel that it put a bit too much personal politics in to be considered an objective learning source. (