Klik op een omslag om naar Google Boeken te gaan.
Bezig met laden... Ralph Roister Doisterdoor Nicholas Udall
Geen Bezig met laden...
Meld je aan bij LibraryThing om erachter te komen of je dit boek goed zult vinden. Op dit moment geen Discussie gesprekken over dit boek. geen besprekingen | voeg een bespreking toe
Subjects: English drama (Comedy)Notes: This is an OCR reprint. There may be numerous typos or missing text. There are no illustrations or indexes.When you buy the General Books edition of this book you get free trial access to Million-Books.com where you can select from more than a million books for free. You can also preview the book there. Geen bibliotheekbeschrijvingen gevonden. |
Actuele discussiesGeenPopulaire omslagen
Google Books — Bezig met laden... GenresDewey Decimale Classificatie (DDC)808Literature By Topic Rhetoric and anthologiesLC-classificatieWaarderingGemiddelde:
Ben jij dit?Word een LibraryThing Auteur. |
A play from Tudor England probably published around 1553 and claimed to be the first English comedy. It would have originally been designed as an interlude and would have been performed at a banquet or other entertainment on a floor space cleared for the purpose. there is plenty of conjecture that it might have been played in front of Queen Mary I, as the final page of the play is nothing less than a homage to the queen.
The plot is a simple one, but would stretch the credibility of audiences today. Mathew Merrygreek is the first person to take the floor and he stresses that laughter is a cure for all the evils of the world and he encourages the audience find the play funny. He describes himself as a manipulator of others, living by his wits and he boasts that he can persuade Ralph Roister Doister to do anything he wants. The Roister Doister character would have been easily recognisable to Tudor audiences, a boastful fool, but a man of some means who can tell stories of exploits in war. He confides to his friend Merrygreek that he has once again fallen in love and Merrygreek seizes on the opportunity to have some fun. Doister is in love with Dame Christian Constance a wealthy widow who is known to be looking for a new husband, but she is already betrothed to Gavin Goodluck a London Merchant. Merrygreek encourages Doister that he should press his suite most forcibly as he is bound to win over Constance. There is much comedy as the super confident Doister arranges with Constances servants: Madge Mumblecrust and Tibet Talkapace to help him win their lady. Constance will have nothing to do with Doister and tells him so as plainly as she can:
“I will not be served with a fool in no wise. When I choose a husband, I hope to take a man.”
Doister egged on by Merrygreek tries to force entry into the house of Constance, but he is beaten back, by her servants and with sly whacks from his friend. However Gavin Goodluck hears about the disturbance and is concerned about Constance’s reputation, she has to prove to him that none of it was her doing.
Most of the comedy is centred around the foolish braggart Doister and some choice repartee with the servants of Constance. The disturbance outside her house with Doister and his servants getting pummelled from all sides would also provide some amusement. Merrygreek's part in all this has to be swallowed by the audience to make it all feasible.
Udall’s dialogue is witty enough with some word play. There is very little sexual innuendo and it all ends with much good humour. What is significant I think is the role of the women in the play. They are all strong characters even the old nurse Mumblecrust is more than a match for Doister. Udall was at one time headmaster of Eton college and in all probability his play would have been performed by the all male students. There is very little religious content and the play seems to be an amalgam of the Roman playwright Terence with some medieval and Renaissance settings, but it is firmly fixed in the milieu of the mid 16th century and points the way for late 16th century drama.
An interesting reading experience for anybody interested in early English drama and for me a 3.5 star read. ( )