Ashton B. Carter (1954–2022)
Auteur van Inside the Five-Sided Box: Lessons from a Lifetime of Leadership in the Pentagon
Over de Auteur
Werken van Ashton B. Carter
Tagged
Algemene kennis
- Officiële naam
- Carter, Ashton Baldwin
- Geboortedatum
- 1954-09-14
- Overlijdensdatum
- 2022-10-24
- Geslacht
- male
- Nationaliteit
- USA
- Geboorteplaats
- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Opleiding
- Yale College (BS ∙ summa cum laude ∙ Physics)
Yale College (BA ∙ summa cum laude ∙ History)
Oxford University (St. John's College) (DSc ∙ Physics) - Beroepen
- physicist
scholar of security studies
public official
United States Assistant Secretary of Defense for Global Strategic Affairs (1993-1996)
United States Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics (2009-2011)
United States Deputy Secretary of Defense (2011-2013) (toon alle 7)
United States Secretary of Defense (2015-2017) - Organisaties
- United States Department of Defense
Bill Clinton administration (1993-1996)
Barack Obama administration (2009-2017)
Barack Obama's cabinet (Secretary of Defense|2015-2017) - Prijzen en onderscheidingen
- Joseph A. Burton Forum Award (1988)
Phi Beta Kappa
Rhodes Scholar
Leden
Besprekingen
Statistieken
- Werken
- 10
- Leden
- 122
- Populariteit
- #163,289
- Waardering
- 3.2
- Besprekingen
- 2
- ISBNs
- 20
Carter must be appalled.
And appalled by the micro-management of diplomatic affairs by the White House, not to mention the blurring of lines between diplomacy and political muckraking.
In this book ostensibly about the leadership of the US Department of Defence by a civilian, Ash Carter stays away from a lot of the sausage making that goes into approving defence spending.
He does shine the light on spending on speculative weapons and runaway spending on familiar programs.
While he empathizes with people who are somewhat flummoxed the extent of US spending on “defence” he clearly believes that the US simply doesn’t work without these expenditures. US commerce, US standards of democracy, and freedoms guaranteed by the US constitution rely to some extent on US hard power.
Clearly, these expenditures are about more than “defence.” They are about hegemony, a hegemony predicated on what is likely to occur in the world over the next 50 years.
… (meer)